J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 184, Issue 2 pp 353-375
Copyright © 1966 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gage, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gage, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hubbard, J. I.

An investigation of the post-tetanic potentiation of end-plate potentials at a mammalian neuromuscular junction

P. W. Gage and J. I. Hubbard

1. End-plate potentials (e.p.p.s) were recorded intracellularly from neuromuscular junctions in curarized or Mg-paralysed rat diaphragm-phrenic nerve preparations in vitro. In Mg-paralysed preparations after 1000 impulses at 100/sec the amplitude of e.p.p.s elicited at 1/sec before and after the tetanus was on average greater than the control amplitude for 120 ± 30 sec.

2. The post-tetanic potentiation (P.T.P.) of e.p.p. amplitudes was not thought to be dependent upon post-tetanic hyperpolarization (P.T.H.) of nerve terminals as it lasted longer than the hyperpolarization generated by an identical tetanus; was unaffected by hyperpolarizing currents which reduced P.T.H. or depolarizing currents which prolonged P.T.H.; and was diminished in solutions containing 30% of the normal NaCl concentration or 1% ethyl alcohol, both of which procedures prolong P.T.H. The magnitude and duration of P.T.P. were influenced by the pH of the bathing solution in the range 7-7·5 although there was no change in P.T.H. under these conditions. The inability of polarizing currents to influence P.T.P. was also thought inconsistent with the hypothesis that P.T.P. is due to an increase in available transmitter.

3. P.T.P. was not thought to be due to sodium accumulation in nerve terminals, for P.T.P. was reduced or abolished by procedures which would be expected to increase the intraterminal sodium ion concentration. These procedures were: exhibition of metabolic inhibitors (1·8 x 10-6 M antimycin A, 3-5 mM sodium azide or 1 mM sodium iodoacetate), exhibition of cardiac glycosides (7·7 x 10-6 M digoxin or 0·42 mM ouabain), and omission of glucose or potassium ions from the bathing solution. Abolition of P.T.P. by potassium-free solutions was also thought to be inconsistent with the hypothesis that P.T.P. is due to a reduction in the potassium concentration in nerve terminals.

4. P.T.P. was not thought to be due to terminal volume changes, for no consistent effect upon the quantal content of e.p.p.s could be detected in hypo- or hyperosmotic solutions.

5. It was concluded that the only hypothesis for P.T.P. not excluded by our experiments was that P.T.P. is due to some change in ionized calcium at a membrane site important in transmitter release.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 The Physiological Society.