J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 186, Issue 3 pp 558-578
Copyright © 1966 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gubisch, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gubisch, R. W.

Optical quality of the human eye

F. W. Campbell and R. W. Gubisch

1. Optical quality of the eye was measured at eight pupil sizes between 1·5 and 6·6 mm diameter by recording the faint light emerging from the eye; this light was reflected from the bright image of a thin line on the fundus.

2. The nature of the fundus reflexion was examined; it was found that the fundus acts very much like a perfect diffuser while retaining polarization.

3. Using the result that the fundus acts like a diffuser, the recorded line images were Fourier analysed to provide modulation transfer functions. These functions indicate an optical quality considerably higher than that found in previous physical studies.

4. Linespread profiles were then derived from the modulation transfer functions. These profiles are 40% narrower than those of previous physical studies for a 3·0 mm pupil. The narrowest profile occurred with a 2·4 mm pupil.

5. Our results demonstrate that physical and psychophysical studies can yield similar estimates of optical quality. The influence of optical factors not common to both techniques is discussed. Evidence for the existence of neural `image sharpening' mechanisms is reviewed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Percept PsychophysHome page
J. M. GOLD, D. TADIN, S. C. COOK, and R. BLAKE
The efficiency of biological motion perception
Percept Psychophys, January 1, 2008; 70(1): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Engles, B. Wooten, and B. Hammond
Macular Pigment: A Test of the Acuity Hypothesis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2922 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. J. Patterson, D. F. Garway-Heath, and D. P. Crabb
Improving the repeatability of topographic height measurements in confocal scanning laser imaging using maximum-likelihood deconvolution.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4415 - 4421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. J. Whitehead, J. A. Mares, and R. P. Danis
Macular Pigment: A Review of Current Knowledge
Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2006; 124(7): 1038 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. Diaz-Douton, A. Benito, J. Pujol, M. Arjona, J. L. Guell, and P. Artal
Comparison of the retinal image quality with a hartmann-shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1710 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Montes-Mico, J. L. Alio, and W. N. Charman
Postblink Changes in the Ocular Modulation Transfer Function Measured by a Double-Pass Method
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 4468 - 4473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. S. Banks, S. Gepshtein, and M. S. Landy
Why Is Spatial Stereoresolution So Low?
J. Neurosci., March 3, 2004; 24(9): 2077 - 2089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. O. Beirne, J. F. J. Logan, M. B. Zlatkova, A. J. Jackson, S. J. A. Rankin, S. Demirel, and R. S. Anderson
Peripheral Resolution for Achromatic and SWS Gratings in Early to Moderate Glaucoma and the Implications for Selective Ganglion Cell Density Loss
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4780 - 4786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Carkeet, S.-W. Leo, B.-K. Khoo, and K.-G. A. Eong
Modulation Transfer Functions in Children: Pupil Size Dependence and Meridional Anisotropy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 3248 - 3256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. L. Smith III, L.-F. Hung, and R. S. Harwerth
The Degree of Image Degradation and the Depth of Amblyopia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2000; 41(12): 3775 - 3781.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. J. McMahon, M. J. M. Lankheet, P. Lennie, and D. R. Williams
Fine Structure of Parvocellular Receptive Fields in the Primate Fovea Revealed by Laser Interferometry
J. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 20(5): 2043 - 2053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Blaser, G. Sperling, and Z.-L. Lu
Measuring the amplification of attention
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11681 - 11686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 The Physiological Society.