J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 189, Issue 2 pp 281-298
Copyright © 1967 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sedgwick, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sedgwick, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, T. D.

The response of single units in the caudate nucleus to peripheral stimulation

E. M. Sedgwick and T. D. Williams

1. Extra- and intracellular recordings have been made of single units in the caudate nucleus of the cat, anaesthetized with alpha chloralose.

2. Pentobarbitone was shown to depress the spontaneous activity and responses of units in the caudate nucleus.

3. Spontaneous activity of units usually took the form of single spikes or bursts of up to four spikes occurring every 100-300 msec.

4. The response to electrical stimulation of limb nerves was a burst of 1-4 spikes after a latency of about 30 msec. Convergence from all four limbs on to single units was observed. It is shown that muscle afferents do not cause these responses.

5. Post stimulus histograms of spontaneously active units show, following stimulation of the limb nerves, recurring cycles of excitation and inhibition at a rate of 3-4 c/s and lasting for several seconds. It is suggested that each stimulus synchronizes the normally rhythmic spontaneous activity.

6. Similar responses have been obtained following stimulation by clicks and flashes of light.

7. Stimulation of the ipsilateral cerebral cortex gave excitatory and inhibitory responses similar to those described above.

8. Possible mechanisms for these responses and their significance are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Mahon, J.-M. Deniau, and S. Charpier
Relationship between EEG Potentials and Intracellular Activity of Striatal and Cortico-striatal Neurons: an In Vivo Study under Different Anesthetics
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2001; 11(4): 360 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Boecker, A. Ceballos-Baumann, P. Bartenstein, A. Weindl, H. R. Siebner, T. Fassbender, F. Munz, M. Schwaiger, and B. Conrad
Sensory processing in Parkinson's and Huntington's disease: Investigations with 3D H215O-PET
Brain, September 1, 1999; 122(9): 1651 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. R. DeLong
Putamen: Activity of Single Units during Slow and Rapid Arm Movements
Science, March 23, 1973; 179(4079): 1240 - 1242.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 The Physiological Society.