J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 192, Issue 3 pp 773-800
Copyright © 1967 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, P. B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, P. B. C.

The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat

M. C. Brown, I. Engberg and P. B. C. Matthews

1. Longitudinal vibration was applied to the de-efferented soleus muscle of anaesthetized cats while recording the discharge of single afferent fibres from the proprioceptors within the muscle. Conditions were defined under which vibration can be used to excite selectively the primary endings of muscle spindles without exciting the secondary endings of muscle spindles or Golgi tendon organs.

2. Frequencies of vibration of 100-500 c/s were used. The maximum amplitude of vibration which the vibrator could produce fell with increasing frequency; it was 250 µ (peak to peak) for 100 c/s and 20 µ for 500 c/s.

3. Primary endings of muscle spindles were very sensitive to vibration. Most could be `driven' to discharge one impulse for each cycle of vibration over the whole of the above range of frequencies, provided the initial tension was moderate (20-200 g wt.). The amplitude of vibration required to produce driving usually varied by less than a factor of two over the whole range of frequencies. The most sensitive endings could be driven by vibrations of below 10 µ amplitude.

4. Stimulation of single fusimotor fibres, whether static or dynamic fusimotor fibres, increased the sensitivity of primary endings to vibration. Contraction of the main muscle, produced by stimulating {alpha} motor fibres, reduced the sensitivity of primary endings even when fusimotor fibres were also being stimulated.

5. The secondary endings were very insensitive to longitudinal vibration and with the amplitudes available not one of twenty-five endings could be driven at 150 c/s or above; one ending could be driven at 100 c/s by vibration of 250 µ amplitude. Stimulation of single fusimotor fibres, probably all of which were static fusimotor fibres, made them slightly more sensitive to vibration but none of them approached the sensitivity of the primary endings.

6. The Golgi tendon organs were as insensitive as the secondary endings when the muscle was not contracting and none could be driven at any frequency in spite of quite high tensions in the muscle. However, when the muscle was made to contract by stimulating {alpha} fibres in ventral root filaments the tendon organs became appreciably more sensitive, the degree of sensitization increasing approximately with the strength of the contraction. They never became as sensitive as the primary endings, and with the amplitudes of vibration available none was driven at frequencies of over 250 c/s.

7. When the amplitude of vibration was somewhat below that required to produce driving of an ending it still produced some increase in its mean frequency of discharge. However, amplitudes of vibration of 25-50 µ applied to a non-contracting muscle, whether with or without fusimotor stimulation, produced driving of nearly all primary endings without any significant increase in the mean frequency of firing of secondary endings or Golgi tendon organs. Such vibration can therefore be used as a specific stimulus for the primary endings in order to investigate the central effects or repetitive discharge of the Ia afferent fibres from them.

8. Experiments on endings in the peroneus longus muscle showed that these behaved similarly to those in soleus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
N. S. Weerakkody, D. A. Mahns, J. L. Taylor, and S. C. Gandevia
Impairment of human proprioception by high-frequency cutaneous vibration
J. Physiol., June 15, 2007; 581(3): 971 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Martinez, T. Perez, C. R. Mirasso, and E. Manjarrez
Stochastic Resonance in the Motor System: Effects of Noise on the Monosynaptic Reflex Pathway of the Cat Spinal Cord
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4007 - 4016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. S. Welgampola and B. L. Day
Craniocentric body-sway responses to 500 Hz bone-conducted tones in man
J. Physiol., November 15, 2006; 577(1): 81 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Durbaba, A. Taylor, P. H. Ellaway, and S. Rawlinson
Classification of longissimus lumborum muscle spindle afferents in the anaesthetized cat
J. Physiol., March 1, 2006; 571(2): 489 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. J. Mottram, K. S. Maluf, J. L. Stephenson, M. K. Anderson, and R. M. Enoka
Prolonged Vibration of the Biceps Brachii Tendon Reduces Time to Failure When Maintaining Arm Position With a Submaximal Load
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1185 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. B. Fallon, R. W. Carr, and D. L. Morgan
Stochastic Resonance in Muscle Receptors
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2429 - 2436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. P. Verschueren, S. P. Swinnen, K. Desloovere, and J. Duysens
Vibration-Induced Changes in EMG During Human Locomotion
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 1299 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. De-Doncker, F. Picquet, J. Petit, and M. Falempin
Characterization of Spindle Afferents in Rat Soleus Muscle Using Ramp-and-Hold and Sinusoidal Stretches
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 442 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H.-H. Chen, W. G. Tourtellotte, and E. Frank
Muscle Spindle-Derived Neurotrophin 3 Regulates Synaptic Connectivity between Muscle Sensory and Motor Neurons
J. Neurosci., May 1, 2002; 22(9): 3512 - 3519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
D. Leduc and A. De Troyer
Effect of chest wall vibration on the canine diaphragm during breathing
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2002; 19(3): 429 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. J. Cordo, C. Flores-Vieira, S. M. P. Verschueren, J. T. Inglis, and V. Gurfinkel
Position Sensitivity of Human Muscle Spindles: Single Afferent and Population Representations
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1186 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. LEDUC, E. BRUNKO, and A. DE TROYER
Response of the Canine Internal Intercostal Muscles to Chest Wall Vibration
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2001; 163(1): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. LEDUC, E. BRUNKO, and A. DE TROYER
Response of the Canine Inspiratory Intercostal Muscles to Chest Wall Vibration
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2000; 161(2): 510 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. J. Brisben, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson
Detection of Vibration Transmitted Through an Object Grasped in the Hand
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 1548 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. P. Verschueren, P. J. Cordo, and S. P. Swinnen
Representation of Wrist Joint Kinematics by the Ensemble of Muscle Spindles From Synergistic Muscles
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2265 - 2276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. E. Misiaszek and K. G. Pearson
Stretch of Quadriceps Inhibits the Soleus H Reflex During Locomotion in Decerebrate Cats
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 2975 - 2984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 The Physiological Society.