J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 200, Issue 2 pp 353-372
Copyright © 1969 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landgren, S.
Right arrow Articles by Silfvenius, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landgren, S.
Right arrow Articles by Silfvenius, H.

Projection to cerebral cortex of Group I muscle afferents from the cat's hind limb

S. Landgren and H. Silfvenius

1. Muscle afferent projections from the contralateral hind limb to the postsigmoid gyrus of the cerebral cortex were investigated in cats anaesthetized with chloralose. The evoked potentials were recorded from the cortical surface or from deeper layers by penetrating micro-electrodes. Graded electrical stimulation of the nerves was used.

2. Group Ia as well as Ib muscle afferents from the contralateral quadriceps, posterior biceps-semitendinosus, gastrocnemius-soleus and deep peroneal muscles projected to two different loci in the postsigmoid gyrus. One of these was located on the dorsal surface of the hemisphere 4-5 mm lateral to the mid line and 1-3 mm posterior to the cruciate sulcus, thus rostro-medial to the postcruciate dimple. The other was located on the medial surface of the hemisphere adjacent to the cruciate sulcus. There was no overlap between the two loci.

3. There was no significant difference in thresholds or latencies of the Group I responses in the two loci. The latency was short and similar to that of the potential evoked by the cutaneous afferents in the somatosensory primary projection areas.

4. The Group Ib path was largely independent of the Ia path, because a maximal Group I volley evoked a response, when the Ia path was made refractory by simultaneous stimulation with a maximal Ia volley at 20 per second.

5. The cortical potentials evoked by the Group I muscle afferents from the contralateral hind limb did not change after transection of the dorsal columns at C1-C3 levels but disappeared after a superficial section in the dorsolateral fascicle at C1 level. The responses were not affected by cerebellectomy. It was concluded that the path travelled with the dorsal spinocerebellar tract or utilized brain stem collaterals of this tract.

6. Group II muscle afferents evoked a response near the border of the Group I loci, but not in the positions where the Group I responses were maximal in amplitude.

7. The receptor origin of the stimulated Group I afferents, the location of the medullary relay in the Group I path and the destination of the efferent outflow from the Group I loci were discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.-I. Ito and A. D. Craig
Vagal Input to Lateral Area 3a in Cat Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 143 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. J. Huffman and L. Krubitzer
Area 3a: Topographic Organization and Cortical Connections in Marmoset Monkeys
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2001; 11(9): 849 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Naito, H. H. Ehrsson, S. Geyer, K. Zilles, and P. E. Roland
Illusory Arm Movements Activate Cortical Motor Areas: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
J. Neurosci., July 15, 1999; 19(14): 6134 - 6144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 The Physiological Society.