J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 206, Issue 1 pp 209-227
Copyright © 1970 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alpern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Torii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alpern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Torii, S.

The attenuation of rod signals by backgrounds

M. Alpern, W. A. H. Rushton and S. Torii

1. The paper which precedes this investigated the nerve interaction between two flashes, {lambda} at centre (Fig. 1a) and {phi} on the surround region (but not on the centre). The size of the inhibitory nerve signal V generated by {phi} is given by V = {phi}({phi} + {sigma}), where {sigma} is the semi-saturation constant.

2. A former paper (Alpern & Rushton, 1967) had shown that when the flash {phi} falls upon a steady background {theta}, V suffers attenuation in the G-box (Fig. 1b) down to the fraction {theta}D/({theta}D + {theta}) where {theta}D is the eigengrau or receptor noise. Thus, in general, the nerve signal N is given by [Formula: see text].

3. This formula had only been established for a moderate range of values. In this paper we use extreme values to explore the limits of its validity. We find the equation to be true over the entire intensity range where N is measurable.

4. Six different types of experiment have been performed to test various features of the equation. For instance, if log N is plotted against log {phi} for various fixed values of {theta}, the curve is always the same with simply a vertical shift. And the shift is equal to log(1 + {theta}/{theta}D) for all values both of {theta} and of {phi}.

5. The most interesting curve is the plot of log {phi} against log {theta} for fixed N. This is similar to the Weber—Fechner increment threshold but the criterion is not that {phi} be strong enough to be detected, but strong enough to generate an N signal just sufficient to inhibit some fixed {lambda} flash. These curves (below the onset of saturation) are all the same except for vertical separation, and prove that the condition for flash detection is that a fixed signal, N0, is generated of size 10-5 of the maximum signal obtainable (i.e. with {phi} large and {theta} zero).

6. With strong backgrounds the curves of (5) above exhibit a marked saturation of the Aguilar & Stiles' type (1954). The family of curves each with a fixed N value shows a remarkable symmetry (Fig. 8) which in fact follows from the equation in (2) above. It has nothing to do with bleached pigment, but follows from the equation in (1) above. V there cannot exceed unity, thus when scaled by the G-box below the criterion level, further increase in {phi} will not bring improvement.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 The Physiological Society.