J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 207, Issue 2 pp 463-475
Copyright © 1970 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alpern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Torii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alpern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Torii, S.

Signals from cones

M. Alpern, W. A. H. Rushton and S. Torii

1. We have studied red and green cones by contrast flash inhibition and found them both to be very similar to rods in their response to flash energy, except that all light quantities must be some 100-fold greater in cones for the same effect.

2. Using the methods of a previous paper (A.R.T. a) where no backgrounds were employed, we plotted log test flash {lambda} against log surround flash {phi} with criterion that {lambda} should just be detected. The experiment was repeated with a `windmill stop' interposed in the {phi} flash which reduced its area symmetrically to 1/8. From these two curves it is possible to extract the relation between N, the inhibitory signal, and {phi}, the test flash. It isN = {phi}/({phi}+{sigma}),where {sigma}, the semi-saturation constant, is about 4·5 log td sec.

3. Using the methods of (A.R.T. b) where backgrounds were studied, we measured the increment threshold for the surround flash {phi} against its background {theta} using as criterion not that {phi} should just be seen but that it should generate a fixed inhibitory signal N so that the fixed test flash {lambda} could just be seen.

4. This increment threshold curve resembled the Aguilar & Stiles (1954) curve for rods, showed saturation and a complete symmetry about the 45° line through the point with co-ordinates (log {theta}D, log {sigma}).

5. These results imply that the cone signal N is related to flash {phi} and steady background {theta} by [Formula: see text], where {theta}D is receptor noise (= eigengrau), and {phi} and {theta} are expressed in units of quantum catch.

6. The ordinary increment threshold for cones does not show saturation because a steady saturating background bleaches all the pigment away. When the background is presented for only 100 msec with dark pauses between, no great bleaching occurs and saturation is seen.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. S Kenkre, N. A Moran, T. D Lamb, and O. A. R Mahroo
Extremely rapid recovery of human cone circulating current at the extinction of bleaching exposures
J. Physiol., August 15, 2005; 567(1): 95 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
D. A. Baylor and R. Fettiplace
Transmission of Signals from Photoreceptors to Ganglion Cells in the Eye of the Turtle
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1976; 40(0): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 The Physiological Society.