| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1. The sensitivity of detecting modulation in a test tone sinusoidally frequency-modulated at a rate 
test is diminished after exposure to a conditioning tone more deeply frequency-modulated at a rate cond provided that cond is not very different from test, the sound amplitude being kept constant for each tone at a comfortable hearing level 40-45 dB above threshold.
2. When cond = test the frequency deviation in the modulated test tone must be increased to about three times the unconditioned threshold magnitude to be detectable immediately after exposure to the conditioning tone. Detection sensitivity returns to normal in about one minute.
3. At low modulation frequencies the conditioning effects are tuned, being much diminished when cond differs from test by a few cycles per second.
4. Comparing monaural with contra-aural conditioning demonstrates a considerable interaural transfer of about 60-80% of the effect, indicating that the conditioning and its selectivity are predominantly central phenomena.
5. The magnitude of the deterioration in detection sensitivity after conditioning is about 3 x at modulation frequencies between about 3/sec and 30/sec. It diminishes at lower and higher modulation frequencies and is effectively absent at 100/sec modulation. The bandwidth of the effect increases from a few cycles per second at the lower end of this range, to some tens of cycles per second at the upper end.
6. For the same modulation frequency, the conditioning is relatively insensitive to the mean `carrier' audiofrequency, f0. The band width in terms of carrier frequency is at least as wide as `critical bands'. With a test signal f0 = 250 Hz, test = 8/sec, conditioning is still appreciable for a conditioning tone of cond = 8/sec but centred upon f0 = 150 Hz or = 350 Hz. Conditioning is thus not explicable in terms of coincidences between particular spectral components in the conditioning and test tones.
7. Whereas the sensitivity of detecting 8/sec amplitude modulation in a tone is conditioned by prior exposure to either amplitude- or frequency-modulated tones, in contrast the detectability of 8/sec frequency-modulated signals is conditioned only by prior exposure to frequency-modulated tones and not by amplitude-modulated conditioning tones. This underlines the special place of frequency modulation in human audition and emphasizes that the operative stimulus cannot be some aspect common to amplitude modulation and frequency modulation, like identical periodicity or coincident positioning of bands in the integrated spectra of the tones, but points to the instantaneous frequency-modulated wave form as the adequate stimulus.
8. These findings strongly suggest that the human auditory pathways contain `channels' in their organization which determine a final response selectively tuned to particular frequency-modulations. Periodicity coding alone cannot adequately explain this effect which may well only be understood in terms of a `place' theory of frequency selectivity.
9. This organization is well suited to subserve the recognition of frequency-modulation patterns in acoustic signals rather independently of the mean audiofrequency that carries the frequency modulation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. J. Malone, B. H. Scott, and M. N. Semple Dynamic Amplitude Coding in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Rhesus Macaques J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1451 - 1474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Liegeois-Chauvel, C. Lorenzi, A. Trebuchon, J. Regis, and P. Chauvel Temporal Envelope Processing in the Human Left and Right Auditory Cortices Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2004; 14(7): 731 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
