HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burns, B. D. Articles by Webb, A. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burns, B. D. Articles by Webb, A. C.

1. We have investigated the responses of single neurones in the visual cerebral cortex of the unanaesthetized, isolated cat's forebrain to excitation of one retina with patterned light. The responses of twenty-six cells to the relative movement of two patterns in the visual field have been recorded.

2. We used several forms of relative movement for stimulation, but all of them involved a change in the separation of two parallel and straight light-dark edges.

3. Responses to this form of stimulation were compared with the responses of the same cells to simple movement, that is, movement of the same patterns without change of distance between their borders.

4. All cells showed a response to relative movement that differed from their response to simple movement.

5. The time-locked phasic response differed in 54% of the cells tested. Of cells responding in this way, 83% of tests produced an increased phasic response.

6. Relative movement brought about changes in the mean frequency of discharge in 96% of the cells tested. 82% of these cells responded with an increased rate of firing.

7. Movement relative to a coarse background pattern affected more neurones and produced a greater change in their behaviour than did movement relative to a fine-grained pattern.

8. The neurones tested represented the central part of the visual field (0-10°); while all were affected by relative movement, those representing points furthest from the optic axis appeared to be most susceptible (we found no correlation between size of receptive field and distance from the optic axis).