J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 226, Issue 3 pp 825-846
Copyright © 1972 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merrill, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wall, P. D.

Factors forming the edge of a receptive field: the presence of relatively ineffective afferent terminals

E. G. Merrill and P. D. Wall

A specialized type of spinal cord cell has its cell body in lamina IV and has a small low threshold cutaneous receptive field which is remarkable for its abrupt edge. No signs could be found of a subliminal fringe to this field since its size remains fixed during wide excursions of the cell's excitability. Reversible blocking of peripheral nerves and dorsal roots showed that the afferents responsible for exciting these cells following natural stimuli, run in a restricted area of peripheral nerve and dorsal root. When the fibres necessary to sustain the natural stimulus receptive field were blocked, it was shown that other large myelinated fibres in neighbouring roots were still capable of firing the cell monosynaptically following electrical stimulation of the root or periphery although no natural stimuli were able to change the cell's excitability. It is necessary to divide the afferent synapses on such cells into a class which is highly effective in firing the cell on natural stimulation and a second class which has no effect yet detected following natural stimuli but which can fire the cell monosynaptically if synchronously activated by electrical stimulation. Suggestions are made for possible presynaptic and post-synaptic mechanisms which might divide the effect of arriving impulses into two such classes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. R. Huxlin and T. Pasternak
Training-induced Recovery of Visual Motion Perception after Extrastriate Cortical Damage in the Adult Cat
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. G. Goshgarian
Plasticity in Respiratory Motor Control: Invited Review: The crossed phrenic phenomenon: a model for plasticity in the respiratory pathways following spinal cord injury
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2003; 94(2): 795 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. L. Parker, M. L. Wood, and J. O. Dostrovsky
A Focal Zone of Thalamic Plasticity
J. Neurosci., January 1, 1998; 18(1): 548 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 The Physiological Society.