J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 229, Issue 2 pp 257-274
Copyright © 1973 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coote, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Zbrozyna, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coote, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Zbrozyna, A. W.

The pontomedullary area integrating the defence reaction in the cat and its influence on muscle blood flow

J. H. Coote, S. M. Hilton and A. W. Zbrozyna

1. In anaesthetized cats the effects were investigated of electrical stimulation of regions in the caudal mesencephalon, pons and medulla on muscle blood flow, skin blood flow and arterial blood pressure.

2. It was found that within the dorsal part of the well known pressor area there is a narrow strip, 2·5 mm lateral from the mid line, starting ventral to the inferior colliculus and ending in the medulla close to the floor of the IV ventricle, from which vasodilatation in skeletal muscles is selectively obtained. This strip is quite separate from the more ventral, efferent pathway for active vasodilatation running from the hypothalamic and rostral mesencephalic `defence centre'.

3. As in the case of the hypothalamic and rostral mesencephalic `defence centre', the muscle vasodilatation obtained from the caudal strip is accompanied not only by a rise of arterial blood pressure, but also by tachycardia, vasoconstriction in the skin, pupillary dilatation and piloerection.

4. Stimulation, restricted to the caudal strip, via implanted electrodes in unanaesthetized animals, produced a behavioural response resembling the defence reaction. The strip, therefore, is probably a caudal extension of the `defence centre'.

5. Unlike the vasodilatation elicited from the more rostral part of the `defence centre' in the hypothalamus and mesencephalon, the muscle vasodilatation obtained on stimulation of the caudal strip was resistant to atropine, but was blocked by guanethidine.

6. It is suggested that during naturally occurring defence reactions in the normal animal the ponto-medullary area is activated together with the hypothalamo-mesencephalic area, inhibition of vasoconstrictor tone then accompanying activation of the vasodilator nerve fibres in skeletal muscle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
S. F. Morrison
Differential control of sympathetic outflow
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): R683 - R698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 The Physiological Society.