J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 231, Issue 2 pp 251-270
Copyright © 1973 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ambache, N.
Right arrow Articles by Zar, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ambache, N.
Right arrow Articles by Zar, M. A.

An inhibition of post-ganglionic motor transmission in the mammalian vas deferens by D-lysergic acid diethylamide

N. Ambache, Linda P. Dunk, J. Verney and M. Aboo Zar

1. Under certain conditions D-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 10-9-10-6 g/ml., exerted an immediate, prolonged and slowly reversible inhibitory effect upon the post-ganglionic motor transmission in desheathed guinea-pig vas deferens preparations.

2. The most critical factor influencing this action of LSD appeared to be the train length. With short trains of less than 4 or 5 pulses the twitch inhibition produced by LSD was often total. With longer trains (5-20 pulses), the degree of inhibition declined with increase in train length. These results suggest the existence of two components in the motor response to post-ganglionic stimulation, distinguished by their susceptibility to LSD.

3. The inhibition of the LSD-susceptible component was related to the dose of LSD in the range 10-9-10-6 g/ml., reaching a maximum at 0·5-1 x 10-6 g/ml. The response remnants elicited by trains of more than 5 pulses under these conditions could not be reduced further by a ten- to twenty-fold increase in LSD concentration to 10-5 g/ml. and were in fact slightly potentiated.

4. The inhibition of post-ganglionic motor transmission by LSD was not explicable on the basis of an {alpha}-adrenoceptor blockade because it was not associated with any reduction in motor responses to noradrenaline.

5. The use of propranolol excluded mediation of the LSD-inhibition by beta-adrenoceptors.

6. The LSD effect was not due to a non-specific smooth muscle depression because it was not associated with any reduction in motor responses to acetylcholine, ATP or bradykinin.

7. The inhibitory effect of LSD on post-ganglionic transmission resembled that of noradrenaline in that it was antagonized by phentolamine; another {alpha}-adrenoceptor blocking agent, phenoxybenzamine, was less effective than phentolamine in this respect.

8. The LSD-inhibition was obtained in preparations taken from reserpinized guinea-pigs.

9. The inhibition of motor transmission in the vas deferens by LSD was confirmed in rats, Meriones shawii and rabbits.

10. The inhibition of post-ganglionic transmission by LSD was unrelated to its ability to antagonize 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), to which the longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig vas deferens is insensitive. The more potent 5-HT antagonists, methysergide and BOL 148 were either virtually inactive or considerably weaker than LSD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 The Physiological Society.