J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 232, Issue 3 pp 427-452
Copyright © 1973 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knibestöl, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knibestöl, M.

Stimulus—response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area

M. Knibestöl

1. Single unit impulses were recorded from the ulnar and median nerves of awake human subjects with tungsten electrodes inserted percutaneously in the upper arm.

2. Forty-nine rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors with receptive fields in the glabrous skin area were studied. Thirty-nine units had small receptive fields with distinct borders (RA-receptors) while ten units had large fields with indistinct borders (PC-receptors).

3. The afferent response to stimuli of varying indentation amplitude and velocity of indentation, was analysed.

4. Amplitude thresholds varied from 0·05 to 1·65 mm for the RA-receptors. For the PC-receptors amplitude thresholds ranged from less than 0·05 to 1·95 mm.

5. Velocity thresholds varied for the RA-receptors from 0·4 to 39·3 mm/sec, and for the PC-receptors from 0·5 to 19·6 mm/sec.

6. The conduction velocities of the afferents were all in the A {alpha}beta range. For the RA-receptors the conduction velocities ranged from 26 to 91 m/sec (mean = 55·3 ± 3·4), and for PC-receptors the range was from 34 to 61 m/sec (mean = 46·9 ± 3·6).

7. The nerve impulse frequency as a function of indentation velocity was analysed for nineteen RA-receptors and four PC-receptors. A hyperbolic log tangent function of the type first introduced by Naka & Rushton (1966) in studies on S-potentials in the fish retina was found to be the best description of the stimulus—response function for sixteen RA-receptors and two PC-receptors. For the remaining units a pure logarithmic function was the best description. However, the logarithmic function may be, as found in the present study, a special case of the more general log tanh function.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. J. Dyck
Enumerating Meissner corpuscles: Future gold standard of large fiber sensorimotor polyneuropathy?
Neurology, December 4, 2007; 69(23): 2116 - 2118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. P. Sripati, S. J. Bensmaia, and K. O. Johnson
A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial Patterns
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3852 - 3864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. B. Fallon, L. R. Bent, P. A. McNulty, and V. G. Macefield
Evidence for Strong Synaptic Coupling Between Single Tactile Afferents From the Sole of the Foot and Motoneurons Supplying Leg Muscles
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3795 - 3804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. B. Edin
Quantitative Analyses of Dynamic Strain Sensitivity in Human Skin Mechanoreceptors
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3233 - 3243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. Birznieks, P. Jenmalm, A. W. Goodwin, and R. S. Johansson
Encoding of Direction of Fingertip Forces by Human Tactile Afferents
J. Neurosci., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 8222 - 8237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. T. Coleman, H. Bahramali, H. Q. Zhang, and M. J. Rowe
Characterization of Tactile Afferent Fibers in the Hand of the Marmoset Monkey
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 1793 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Bisley, A. W. Goodwin, and H. E. Wheat
Slowly Adapting Type I Afferents From the Sides and End of the Finger Respond to Stimuli on the Center of the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson
SA1 and RA Receptive Fields, Response Variability, and Population Responses Mapped with a Probe Array
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2701 - 2710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson
Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey
J. Neurosci., January 1, 1999; 19(1): 401 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. H. Lamotte, R. M. Friedman, C. Lu, P. S. Khalsa, and M. A. Srinivasan
Raised Object on a Planar Surface Stroked Across the Fingerpad: Responses of Cutaneous Mechanoreceptors to Shape and Orientation
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2446 - 2466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. W. Goodwin, V. G. Macefield, and J. W. Bisley
Encoding of Object Curvature by Tactile Afferents From Human Fingers
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 2881 - 2888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. T. Blake, K. O. Johnson, and S. S. Hsiao
Monkey Cutaneous SAI and RA Responses to Raised and Depressed Scanned Patterns: Effects of Width, Height, Orientation, and a Raised Surround
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2503 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 The Physiological Society.