J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 234, Issue 2 pp 327-352
Copyright © 1973 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magleby, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magleby, K. L.

The effect of repetitive stimulation on facilitation of transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction

K. L. Magleby

1. End-plate potentials (e.p.p.s) were recorded from frog neuromuscular junctions blocked with high Mg and/or low Ca to characterize the processes underlying increased transmitter release during repetitive stimulation.

2. There was a progressive increase in the amplitude of successive e.p.p.s during repetitive stimulation. Increasing the frequency or duration of stimulation increased this facilitation of e.p.p. amplitudes. Facilitation is defined as the fractional increase in amplitude of a test e.p.p. over a control.

3. By assuming that each impulse in a train contributes an identical increment of facilitation that sums linearly with the facilitation contributed by the previous impulses, estimates of the facilitation contributed by a single impulse, f(t), were made from the incremental increase in e.p.p. amplitudes during repetitive stimulation. The average value of f(t) contributed by the first impulse in the train during stimulation at 20/sec is given by Formula,where t is in msec. The first two terms in this equation were independent of the stimulation rate used to determine f(t) while the coefficient of the third term was a function of the stimulation rate, decreasing 2 to 3 times when the stimulation rate was decreased from 20/sec to 1/sec.

4. This linear facilitation model predicted growth of e.p.p. amplitudes during the first several hundred msec of repetitive stimulation. Thereafter, e.p.p. amplitudes were typically facilitated more than predicted by the linear model.

5. Several new methods are presented which can be used to obtain estimates of the magnitude and time course of facilitation contributed by specific impulses during repetitive stimulation.

6. It is found that the value of short-term f(t) in the tested range of 25-300 msec progressively increases during repetitive stimulation while its time course of decay remains unchanged. After 9 sec of stimulation at 20/sec, the short-term f(t) increased to 1·4 times control.

7. The increase in short-term f(t) was independent of whether it was determined from a step increase or decrease in total facilitation, excluding the possibility that the observed increase in short-term f(t) resulted from a change in the rate of decay of facilitation.

8. It is suggested with supporting data from the following paper (Magleby, 1973) that each impulse contributes two types of facilitation that are responsible for the growth of e.p.p.s during repetitive stimulation: a short-term facilitation with linear summation properties described by the first two terms in the expression in paragraph 3 and a long-term cumulative facilitation approximated by the third term. The long-term facilitation is expressed as an increase in both the short-term facilitation and in the base level of transmitter release. The relative contribution of these two expressions of the long-term facilitation to the third term is a function of the stimulation rate and is given by the ratio of facilitation to the base level of transmitter release.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. M. Kalkstein and K. L. Magleby
Augmentation Increases Vesicular Release Probability in the Presence of Masking Depression at the Frog Neuromuscular Junction
J. Neurosci., December 15, 2004; 24(50): 11391 - 11403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. R. Bennett, L. Farnell, and W. G. Gibson
The Facilitated Probability of Quantal Secretion within an Array of Calcium Channels of an Active Zone at the Amphibian Neuromuscular Junction
Biophys. J., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 2674 - 2690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Hong and C. C. Chang
Evaluation of Intrinsic Modulation of Synaptic Transmission by ATP in Mouse Fast Twitch Muscle
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2550 - 2558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Markram, Y. Wang, and M. Tsodyks
Differential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons
PNAS, April 28, 1998; 95(9): 5323 - 5328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-H. Wang and P. T. Kelly
Attenuation of Paired-Pulse Facilitation Associated With Synaptic Potentiation Mediated by Postsynaptic Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2707 - 2716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Zhou and S. Misler
Action Potential-induced Quantal Secretion of Catecholamines from Rat Adrenal Chromaffin Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 1995; 270(8): 3498 - 3505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 The Physiological Society.