| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1. Intracellular recordings were made from bipolar and amacrine cells in the isolated goldfish retina. Cells were identified mainly from their response patterns to a spot and an annulus in reference to the knowledge obtained from the previous work of intracellular Procion Yellow injection. Using white light and monochromatic lights receptive field organization of recorded cells were analysed.
2. All bipolar cells had a centre-surround organization in their receptive fields. The field centre was estimated to be 100-200 µm in diameter, and the surround 1-1·5 mm.
3. Bipolar cells were classified into two types according to the response properties to monochromatic lights. Opponent colour cells received inputs from red and green cones, responding with red on-centre, red and green off-surround or vice versa. Cells without colour coding received input from red cones both in the field centre and the surround. In these cells the centre and the surround were well balanced.
4. Amacrine cells were also classified into two types, a sustained type and a transient type. The sustained type amacrine cells responded with a steady potential change and were colour coded. They were hyperpolarized by red and depolarized by green light. The transient type amacrine cells responded with transient depolarization at on and off of light flashes. They received input chiefly from red cones and were not colour coded. Both types of amacrine cells showed a large spatial summation in an area over 2·5 mm; centre-surround antagonism was not seen.
5. Comparing the size of the receptive field with anatomy, especially with the size of dendritic spread, the field centre of bipolar cells agreed in size with their dendritic spread. Bipolar cell surround clearly exceeded its dendritic field. Since the response properties of the bipolar cell surround was mimicked most closely by the receptive field of external horizontal cells, the input to the bipolar cell surround is thought to be mediated by external horizontal cells.
6. By comparing receptive field properties of various retinal cells it is suggested that both the opponent colour bipolar cells and the colour coded amacrine cells converge on to the double opponent ganglion cells.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Y. Wong and J. E. Dowling Retinal Bipolar Cell Input Mechanisms in Giant Danio. III. ON-OFF Bipolar Cells and Their Color-Opponent Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 265 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Djupsund, T. Furukawa, S. Yasui, and M. Yamada Asymmetric Temporal Properties in the Receptive Field of Retinal Transient Amacrine Cells J. Gen. Physiol., September 29, 2003; 122(4): 445 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Passaglia, C. Enroth-Cugell, and J. B. Troy Effects of Remote Stimulation on the Mean Firing Rate of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells J. Neurosci., August 1, 2001; 21(15): 5794 - 5803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-I. Watanabe, A. Koizumi, S. Matsunaga, J. W. Stocker, and A. Kaneko GABA-Mediated Inhibition Between Amacrine Cells in the Goldfish Retina J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1826 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Kraaij, H. Spekreijse, and M. Kamermans The Open- and Closed-Loop Gain-Characteristics of the Cone/Horizontal Cell Synapse in Goldfish Retina J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1256 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X.-L. Yang and S. M. Wu Response Sensitivity and Voltage Gain of the Rod- and Cone-Bipolar Cell Synapses in Dark-Adapted Tiger Salamander Retina J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2662 - 2673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
