J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 236, Issue 1 pp 211-224
Copyright © 1974 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, E. A.

Responses of bipolar cells in the retina of the turtle

E. A. Schwartz

The responses of bipolar cells in the retina of the turtle have been studied by intracellular recording. Two types of bipolar cell have been identified: one gave graded depolarizing and the other graded hyperpolarizing responses to small circles of light (100 µm diameter). The responses of both types of cell were similar in the following respects.

1. Both were extremely sensitive to dim light; the amplitude of response to a small circle of light increased with light intensity more steeply than the cone response.

2. Enlarging the diameter of a spot added an antagonistic effect which decreased response amplitude. This decrease in response amplitude was more apparent at dim than at bright light. Stimulating only distant areas of retina with an annulus produced a response of polarity opposite to that normally produced by a central spot. However, the responses of bipolar cells did not appear to be due to a simple summation of opposite polarity signals contributed from central and peripheral parts of their receptive fields.

3. When small spots or annuli of light were turned off there frequently occurred an overshooting OFF transient. The occurrence of OFF transients depended on the duration of the stimulus. Cones recorded under similar conditions produced an OFF depolarization. The size of cone OFF depolarizations increased with increasing duration of the preceding light; following approximately 3 sec of illumination their maximum amplitude was roughly 1/10 the amplitude of the preceding hyperpolarization. The size of OFF responses in both cone and bipolar cells was increased when horizontal cells were hyperpolarized by light.

It is concluded that bipolar cells produce large responses for very small cone responses, and, as a consequence, a small depolarization in cones following illumination produces large OFF transients in bipolar cells. Furthermore, the responses of bipolar cells do not appear to represent a simple summation of opposite polarity input from receptor and horizontal cells.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. A. Schwartz
Transport-Mediated Synapses in the Retina
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2002; 82(4): 875 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Matsui, N. Hosoi, and M. Tachibana
Excitatory Synaptic Transmission in the Inner Retina: Paired Recordings of Bipolar Cells and Neurons of the Ganglion Cell Layer
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1998; 18(12): 4500 - 4510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X.-L. Yang and S. M. Wu
Response Sensitivity and Voltage Gain of the Rod- and Cone-Bipolar Cell Synapses in Dark-Adapted Tiger Salamander Retina
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2662 - 2673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 The Physiological Society.