J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 238, Issue 3 pp 627-638
Copyright © 1974 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cormack, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Heath, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cormack, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Heath, J. R.

New techniques for calibrating the Lloyd—Haldane apparatus

R. S. Cormack and J. R. Heath

1. A new way of measuring the graduation error in the stem of the Lloyd—Haldane burette is described, in which a fixed mass of water is made to occupy different parts of the stem. This gave the same answer as the gravimetric method, but was much easier.

2. Two independent methods of measuring the `meniscus error' gave values of 0·006 and 0·008 ml. respectively. It is concluded that the bulb volume can be measured gravimetrically with the burette inverted, provided that the value so obtained is corrected by adding about 0·007 ml.

3. Alternatively, this estimation can be made with the burette the right way up, no correction then being needed. To do this the lower end of the burette must be blocked and a method of doing this without the need to fuse on a glass tap is described.

4. After calibration by the above methods analyses on fresh air for CO2 + O2 gave a mean value of 20·98%, which, in the authors' view, is the correct value.

5. The observer error was measured and from this the theoretical maximum accuracy of gas analysis by Haldane's method was calculated. It is concluded that the calculated% should be correct to the second decimal place in about half the analyses, the rest having an error of ± 0·01%. Results approaching this were obtained.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 The Physiological Society.