J Physiol Boston Smyposia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 242, Issue 3 pp 759-791
Copyright © 1974 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baylor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baylor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, T. D.

Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light

D. A. Baylor, A. L. Hodgkin and T. D. Lamb

1. Theoretical equations which predict the electrical response of turtle cones to a wide range of light stimuli are developed from the experiments described in previous papers.

2. The central points in the theory are that (a) light starts a chain of reactions leading to the production of a substance which blocks ionic channels in the outer segment, (b) an equilibrium between blocking molecules and open channels is rapidly established, (c) the blocking molecules are removed or inactivated by a chain of reactions, the first of which is autocatalytic, (d) in addition to the conductance which decreases with light there is also a conductance which increases with a delay when the cone is hyperpolarized.

3. Parameters in the theory were deduced by approximate equations from the experiments described in the previous papers.

4. There was good agreement between the properties of real and model cones in the following cases: (a) the response to 10 msec flashes and 0·7 sec steps of light calculated to give between 20 and 5 x 107 photoisomerizations per cone at times extending to about 2 sec; (b) the complicated changes in the response to a test flash that occur when it is superposed on background lights of increasing intensity; (c) the after-hyperpolarization and period of reduced sensitivity following a strong flash.

5. The main defect of the theory is that the effect of background light in shortening the time to maximum of the response to a flash was more pronounced in a real cone than in the model.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Knopp and H. Ruppel
Calcium-Sensitive Downregulation of the Transduction Chain in Rod Photoreceptors of the Rat Retina
Biophys. J., August 1, 2006; 91(3): 1078 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust
Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does?
J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Volgyi, M. R. Deans, D. L. Paul, and S. A. Bloomfield
Convergence and Segregation of the Multiple Rod Pathways in Mammalian Retina
J. Neurosci., December 8, 2004; 24(49): 11182 - 11192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Savchenko, T. W. Kraft, E. Molokanova, and R. H. Kramer
Growth factors regulate phototransduction in retinal rods by modulating cyclic nucleotide-gated channels through dephosphorylation of a specific tyrosine residue
PNAS, May 8, 2001; 98(10): 5880 - 5885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 The Physiological Society.