J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 243, Issue 1 pp 195-210
Copyright © 1974 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carmody, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carmody, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rowe, M.

Inhibition within the trigeminal nucleus induced by afferent inputs and its influence on stimulus coding by mechanosensitive neurones

John Carmody and Mark Rowe

1. In decerebrate, unanaesthetized cats two thirds of slowly adapting mechanosensitive neurones sampled in the trigeminal nucleus oralis exhibited inhibition in response to conditioning mechanical stimulation applied beyond their excitatory receptive fields. The influence of this inhibition was examined over the response range of these neurones using controlled, reproducible natural stimulation procedures.

2. The extent of the inhibition was graded according to the intensity of the conditioning stimulus. It was evoked most strongly by vibratory skin indentation which very effectively excites rapidly adapting afferent fibres. Tonic conditioning inputs associated with steady skin indentation were less effective.

3. The slope of stimulus—response relationships constructed from responses to inputs from the excitatory receptive field was reduced in 42% of trigeminal nuclear cells in the presence of afferent-induced inhibition. In the remainder the slope was unchanged.

4. There was no evidence, in the neurones subject to inhibition, of an expansion of their dynamic range defined as the range of stimulus intensities over which a neurone exhibited a graded responsiveness.

5. The variability in responses of an individual neurone at a given stimulus intensity was unchanged by this inhibition.

6. Analysis of the stimulus—response data using information theory statistics revealed that neurones which underwent a reduction in the slope of their stimulus—response relationship in the presence of inhibition displayed a reduced capacity for defining the intensity of skin indentation. This capacity was not modified in those neurones where the slope was unchanged by the peripherally evoked inhibition.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. T. Coleman, H. Bahramali, H. Q. Zhang, and M. J. Rowe
Characterization of Tactile Afferent Fibers in the Hand of the Marmoset Monkey
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 1793 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 The Physiological Society.