J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 243, Issue 3 pp 695-715
Copyright © 1974 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kauer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kauer, J. S.

Response patterns of amphibian olfactory bulb neurones to odour stimulation

John S. Kauer

1. Responses of 199 single olfactory bulb neurones in the frog were observed with odour stimulation.

2. To effect control over the concentration, flow rate and time course of the stimulus application, a simple olfactometer was developed and calibrated using a gas chromatograph. The stimulus pulses were monitored by recording the electro-olfactogram from the olfactory mucosa.

3. Several categories of unit activity became evident after delivering many odour applications (637). Some odour applications did not cause any change in the spontaneous activity of the unit. This was classified as type N (no response) activity. Some applications caused a suppression of ongoing activity (type S activity). Some applications caused an excitation during the rising concentration phase of the stimulus pulse (type E activity). Three temporal patterns of excitatory responses were seen and these were categorized as subgroups of activity type E.

4. Since each response type was seen with about the same frequency regardless of the odour used, this suggested that the temporal patterns of response per se were not coding for odour type.

5. When odour concentration was manipulated for a unit showing suppressive (type S) activity at one concentration, then the unit tended to show qualitatively similar suppression at other concentrations as long as they were above threshold.

6. When peak concentrations were manipulated for units showing excitatory (type E) activity, the temporal patterns of response could change dramatically. In many cases the units fired after one level of concentration had been reached and were subsequently suppressed with increase in concentration. Such `concentration tuning' suggested that excitatory temporal patterns, in contrast to suppressive ones, were coding odour concentration information.

7. The significance of the changes in temporal response patterns seen here, for experiments examining the relationships between odours using single unit response data, is discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Spors, M. Wachowiak, L. B. Cohen, and R. W. Friedrich
Temporal Dynamics and Latency Patterns of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb
J. Neurosci., January 25, 2006; 26(4): 1247 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Cang and J. S. Isaacson
In Vivo Whole-Cell Recording of Odor-Evoked Synaptic Transmission in the Rat Olfactory Bulb
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 4108 - 4116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
T. K. Alkasab, J. White, and J. S. Kauer
A Computational System for Simulating and Analyzing Arrays of Biological and Artificial Chemical Sensors
Chem Senses, March 1, 2002; 27(3): 261 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. W. Friedrich and G. Laurent
Dynamic Optimization of Odor Representations by Slow Temporal Patterning of Mitral Cell Activity
Science, February 2, 2001; 291(5505): 889 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. M. Dorries and J. S. Kauer
Relationships Between Odor-Elicited Oscillations in the Salamander Olfactory Epithelium and Olfactory Bulb
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 754 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Wehr and G. Laurent
Relationship between Afferent and Central Temporal Patterns in the Locust Olfactory System
J. Neurosci., January 1, 1999; 19(1): 381 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. R. Kelliher, Y.-M. Chang, S. R. Wersinger, and M. J. Baum
Sex Difference and Testosterone Modulation of Pheromone-Induced NeuronalFos in the Ferret's Main Olfactory Bulb and Hypothalamus
Biol Reprod, December 1, 1998; 59(6): 1454 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. R. Chen, J. Midtgaard, and G. M. Shepherd
Forward and Backward Propagation of Dendritic Impulses and Their Synaptic Control in Mitral Cells
Science, October 17, 1997; 278(5337): 463 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Laurent, M. Wehr, and H. Davidowitz
Temporal Representations of Odors in an Olfactory Network
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1996; 16(12): 3837 - 3847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. W. Margrie, B. Sakmann, and N. N. Urban
Action potential propagation in mitral cell lateral dendrites is decremental and controls recurrent and lateral inhibition in the mammalian olfactory bulb
PNAS, January 2, 2001; 98(1): 319 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 The Physiological Society.