J Physiol Boston Smyposia
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 247, Issue 3 pp 745-757
Copyright © 1975 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rüegg, D
Right arrow Articles by Wiesendanger, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rüegg, D
Right arrow Articles by Wiesendanger, M

Corticofugal effects from sensorimotor area I and somatosensory area II on neurones of the pontine nuclei in the cat.

D Rüegg and M Wiesendanger

1. The objective of the present experiments was to study the cortical influence from sensorimotor area I (SM I) and from somatosensory area II (S II) on single neurones of the pontine nuclei (PN) in cats under N2--thiamylal anaesthesia. 2. Extracellular single unit recordings revealed a considerable convergence from S II and SM I. Out of ninety-one PN neurones (identified as ponto-cerebellas neurones by antidromic stimulation of the contralateral brachium pontis), fifty-seven neurones were influenced by stimulation of at least one cortical site. Slightly less than half of these neurones (twenty-five) had a convergent input from SM I and S II; twenty-three PN neurones were excited by SM I only and nine PN neurones by S II only. The proportion of PN neurones excited via collaterals of cortico-spinal neurones was small and restricted to those neurones which had an input from SM I. 3. Sixty per cent of the ponto-cerebellar neurones were reliably activated by natural stimulation such as tapping or passive manipulations of limbs of various joints. The vast majority (thirty-three out of thirty-six PN neurones) which had receptive fields were also influenced by electrical stimulation of one or both cortical areas. The long latency and low probability of discharge to peripheral nerve stimulation suggest a complex, probably transcortical, pathway from the periphery to the PN. 4. The distribution of latencies to both cortical and brachium pontis stimulation indicates that the PN are a relay for fast and slow cerebro-cerebellar connexions. 5. The convergence from cortical areas on PN indicates that the neurones influenced from somatic areas SM I and S II transmit integrated patterns of activity to the cerebellum.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. Komaba, M. Mishina, K. Utsumi, Y. Katayama, S. Kobayashi, and O. Mori
Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Patients With Cortical Infarction: Logistic Regression Analysis to Control for Confounding Effects
Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 472 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Mock, C. Schwarz, and P. Thier
Electrophysiological Properties of Rat Pontine Nuclei Neurons In Vitro II. Postsynaptic Potentials
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3338 - 3350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 The Physiological Society.