J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 248, Issue 2 pp 413-431
Copyright © 1975 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pugh, E N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pugh, E N

Rushton's paradox: rod dark adaptation after flash photolysis.

E N Pugh

1. Rod dark adaptations after a photoregenerating flash and quantum-equivalent 30 sec bleach are found to be in exact agreement, while the measured rhodopsin regenerations are grossly different. This finding confirms and clarifies "Rushton's paradox', the failure of the Dowling-Rushton equation (linking log sensitivity linearly with unregenerated rhodopsin) to account for human rod dark adaptation after flash photolysis. 2. The hypothesis that the agreement between rod dark adaptation curves after a photoregenerating flash and after a quantum-equivalent 30 sec bleach is coincidental is rejected on the basic of two classes of experiments. 3. Rod "bleaching' adaptation is demonstrated to be entirely determined by the number of rhodopsin molecules which absorb at least one quantum in a temporal period T, whose range includes the time interval 600 musec less than or equal T less than or equal 30 sec. This generalization obtains over the entire scotopic energy range (congruent to 3 log units) where rod dark adaptations has been studied. 4. Thus, the state of "bleaching' adaptation is determined by some by-product of the normal chain of events in scotopic excitation. About this by-product three important deductions are made: (i) its production is a monotonic function of the initial effective quantum absorptions; (ii) its production occurs before the metarhodopsin I leads to to metarhodopsin II dark reaction; (iii) it cannot be any photoproduct of the rhodopsin cycle.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. D. Lamb and E. N. Pugh Jr
Phototransduction, Dark Adaptation, and Rhodopsin Regeneration The Proctor Lecture
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5138 - 5152.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Cameron, O. A. R. Mahroo, and T. D. Lamb
Dark adaptation of human rod bipolar cells measured from the b-wave of the scotopic electroretinogram
J. Physiol., September 1, 2006; 575(2): 507 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. G. Jacobson, A. V. Cideciyan, E. Wright, and A. F. Wright
Phenotypic Marker for Early Disease Detection in Dominant Late-Onset Retinal Degeneration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2001; 42(8): 1882 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. C. Caruso, J. Zujewski, F. Iwata, M. J. Podgor, B. A. Conley, L. M. Ayres, and M. I. Kaiser-Kupfer
Effects of Fenretinide (4-HPR) on Dark Adaptation
Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 1998; 116(6): 759 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 The Physiological Society.