J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 252, Issue 3 pp 585-601
Copyright © 1975 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frank, G B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frank, G B

Two mechanisms for the meperidine block of action potential production in frog's skeletal muscle; non-specific and opiate drug receptor mediated blockade.

G B Frank

The effects of meperidine and naloxone, and their interaction effects on action potential production in frog's sartorius muscle fibres, were studied with intracellular micro-electrode techniques. 1. Meperidine, a narcotic analgesic drug, depressed the rate of rise, the rate of fall and the amplitude of the action potentials. 2. At a meperidine concentration of 0-35 mM, the depression in the action potential maximum rate of rise followed a diphasic time course. At first there was a rapid reduction in the maximum rate of rise which was levelling off at about 60% of control 60-90 min after drug application. This was followed by the second phase during which there was an initial rapid decrease in the maximum rate of rise and all surface fibres were inexcitable by 180 min. 3. The addition of naloxone, a narcotic antagonist, in low concentrations (3 X 10(-5) to 3 X 10(-4) mM) at 70-90 min blocked the second phase of the meperidine-induced depression. 4. With lower concentrations of meperidine (0-18 and 0-07 mM) the depression usually developed more slowly (up to 6 hr with the latter dose) and the addition of low naloxone concentrations partially antagonized the effects of meperidine. However, under no conditions was it possible to completely antagonize the effects of meperidine by the addition of naloxone. 5. A linear relation was found between action potential amplitude and the action potential maximum rate of fall. 6. Meperidine caused a shift in the relation of rate of fall against amplitude to higher action potential amplitudes, indicating that the drug inhibited the increase in potassium conductivity (gK) associated with the falling phase of the action potential. 7. When low naloxone concentrations antagonized the effects of meperidine on the rate of rise and restored action potential amplitudes to control levels, the effect of meperidine on the maximum rate of fall was not antagonized. 8. Larger naloxone concentrations (1-5 X 10(-2) mM or more) depressed the action potential rate of rise but did not alter the relation between action potential amplitude and the maximum rate of fall. 9. It is proposed that meperidine blocks action potential production by two mechanisms: (i) a non-specific mechanism in which the increases in both gNa and gK ar depressed and (ii) an opiate drug receptor mediated mechanism causing a specific depression of gNa. 10. The impression gained from the results is that there are opiate drug receptors located on the inner surface of the muscle membrane associated with the 'sodium channels' and that drug activation of these receptors by either meperidine or high naloxone concentrations interferes with the opening of the 'sodium channels' normally produced by membrane depolarization.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 The Physiological Society.