|
|
||||||||
1. Muscles were placed in a solution which depolarized the membrane to -30 to -20 mV so that mechanical activation was made refractory. Mechanical repriming and the recovery of voltage dependent charge movement were studied using a voltage clamp technique. 2. Mechanical repriming was investigated by determining the duration of a hyperpolarizing pulse required to elicit a just-visible contraction for various post-pulse potentials. As the post-pulse potential was made more positive shorter repriming times were required to produce a threshold contraction. The relationship approached a minimum repriming time for very positive post-pulse potentials. 3. These results suggest that hyperpolarization gradually removes some component of the activation mechanism from a refractory state and that the effectiveness of the amount which has recovered depends on the post-pulse potential. A quantitative explanation is given using a simple model in which the essential component is assumed to be the charge movement process. 4. The rate of repriming contraction is voltage dependent; at -160 mV the rate is about twice that at -120 mV. Between 4 and 10 degrees C the rate has a Q10 of about 9. 5. Recovery of charge movement was studied using a repriming duration less than that required to produce a threshold contraction. The observed charge movement increased linearly with repriming time, consistent with the approximately linear initial segment of a slow exponential recovery process. Extrapolation of the recovery curve indicated that 2-5 n/CmuF of charge is reprimed in the time necessary to reprime a threshold contraction. 6. The charge which recovers during a subthreshold repriming pulse is distributed according to membrane potential in the same way as a fully reprimed charge. 7. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that voltage dependent charge movement is an intermediate step in excitation-contraction coupling. 8. The characteristics of a second type of charge movement are also described.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. G. Allen, G. D. Lamb, and H. Westerblad Skeletal Muscle Fatigue: Cellular Mechanisms Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 287 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. DiFranco, J. Capote, M. Quinonez, and J. L. Vergara Voltage-dependent Dynamic FRET Signals from the Transverse Tubules in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle Fibers J. Gen. Physiol., November 26, 2007; 130(6): 581 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Klein, A. Lacampagne, and M. F. Schneider Voltage dependence of the pattern and frequency of discrete Ca2+ release events after brief repriming in frog skeletal muscle PNAS, September 30, 1997; 94(20): 11061 - 11066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |