J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 254, Issue 2 pp 361-388
Copyright © 1976 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adrian, R H
Right arrow Articles by Rakowski, R F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adrian, R H
Right arrow Articles by Rakowski, R F

Charge movement and mechanical repriming in skeletal muscle.

R H Adrian, W K Chandler and R F Rakowski

1. Muscles were placed in a solution which depolarized the membrane to -30 to -20 mV so that mechanical activation was made refractory. Mechanical repriming and the recovery of voltage dependent charge movement were studied using a voltage clamp technique. 2. Mechanical repriming was investigated by determining the duration of a hyperpolarizing pulse required to elicit a just-visible contraction for various post-pulse potentials. As the post-pulse potential was made more positive shorter repriming times were required to produce a threshold contraction. The relationship approached a minimum repriming time for very positive post-pulse potentials. 3. These results suggest that hyperpolarization gradually removes some component of the activation mechanism from a refractory state and that the effectiveness of the amount which has recovered depends on the post-pulse potential. A quantitative explanation is given using a simple model in which the essential component is assumed to be the charge movement process. 4. The rate of repriming contraction is voltage dependent; at -160 mV the rate is about twice that at -120 mV. Between 4 and 10 degrees C the rate has a Q10 of about 9. 5. Recovery of charge movement was studied using a repriming duration less than that required to produce a threshold contraction. The observed charge movement increased linearly with repriming time, consistent with the approximately linear initial segment of a slow exponential recovery process. Extrapolation of the recovery curve indicated that 2-5 n/CmuF of charge is reprimed in the time necessary to reprime a threshold contraction. 6. The charge which recovers during a subthreshold repriming pulse is distributed according to membrane potential in the same way as a fully reprimed charge. 7. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that voltage dependent charge movement is an intermediate step in excitation-contraction coupling. 8. The characteristics of a second type of charge movement are also described.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. G. Allen, G. D. Lamb, and H. Westerblad
Skeletal Muscle Fatigue: Cellular Mechanisms
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 287 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
M. DiFranco, J. Capote, M. Quinonez, and J. L. Vergara
Voltage-dependent Dynamic FRET Signals from the Transverse Tubules in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle Fibers
J. Gen. Physiol., November 26, 2007; 130(6): 581 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. G. Klein, A. Lacampagne, and M. F. Schneider
Voltage dependence of the pattern and frequency of discrete Ca2+ release events after brief repriming in frog skeletal muscle
PNAS, September 30, 1997; 94(20): 11061 - 11066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 The Physiological Society.