J Physiol Editor in Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 257, Issue 1 pp 199-227
Copyright © 1976 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heath, C J
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heath, C J
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C G

Inputs from low threshold muscle and cutaneous afferents of hand and forearm to areas 3a and 3b of baboon's cerebral cortex.

C J Heath, J Hore and C G Phillips

The posterior wall of the central sulcus in forelimb area of SI has been expolred with extracellular micro-electrodes in baboons lightyl anaesthetized with nitrous oxide and sodium thiopentone. 2. The excitatory responses of 130 single units to low intensity electrical stimulation of the deep radial (muscle) and the superficial radial (cutaneous) nerves have been investigated. 3. Units that responded only to muscle nerve stimulation were located in area 3a but overlapped into area 3b. Units that responded only to cutaneous nerve stimulation were found mainly in area 3b but a number occurred in area 3a. Units that responded to both muscle and nerve stimuli (convergent units) were found throughout area 3a and the rostral part of area 3b. 4. Latency analyses of all three response groups revealed a single population of units responding to low threshold muscle nerve stimulation (mean latency 8.5 msec), and both early and late populations responding to low threshold cutaneous nerve stimulation (mean latencies 9.5 and 13.6 msec respectively). A number of the convergent units had very similar latencies for both inputs. 5. Electrical stimulation within area 3a deminstrated a projection from areas 1 and 3b to area 3a; such a pathway may provide a route for excitation of the late skin population which was found mainly in area 3a. 6. In area 3a units commonly responded to light touch, local pressure or deep pressure but only rarely to movement of hairs. A number of the convergent units responded to natural stimulation of cutaneous receptors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-A. Rathelot and P. L. Strick
Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: An anatomical perspective
PNAS, May 23, 2006; 103(21): 8257 - 8262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Rosenkranz, A. Williamon, K. Butler, C. Cordivari, A. J. Lees, and J. C. Rothwell
Pathophysiological differences between musician's dystonia and writer's cramp
Brain, April 1, 2005; 128(4): 918 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
K. Rosenkranz and J. C Rothwell
The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex
J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 307 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. Inui, X. Wang, Y. Tamura, Y. Kaneoke, and R. Kakigi
Serial Processing in the Human Somatosensory System
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2004; 14(8): 851 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
K. J. Huffman and L. Krubitzer
Area 3a: Topographic Organization and Cortical Connections in Marmoset Monkeys
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2001; 11(9): 849 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 The Physiological Society.