J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 258, Issue 1 pp 33-61
Copyright © 1976 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gustafsson, B
Right arrow Articles by Jankowska, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gustafsson, B
Right arrow Articles by Jankowska, E

Direct and indirect activation of nerve cells by electrical pulses applied extracellularly.

B Gustafsson and E Jankowska

1. The mode of activation of nerve cells by extracellular stimuli was investigated while recording from a selected cell with one electrode, and applying current pulses around this cell with another electrode. The analysis was done on motoneurones and on spinal border cells from lower lumbar segments in the cat. 2. Directly evoked action potentials were defined by their appearance in an all-or-none fashion with stable latencies of less than 0-5 ms. The lowest thresholds for their generation were 0-15-0-20 muA in the spinal border cells and 0-35-0-40 muA in the motoneurones. In the main series on motoneurones a correlation has been established between different positions of the extracellular stimulating electrode in relation to the cells and the thresholds for the direct excitation of these cells. The position of the electrode were defined on the basis of an analysis of the IS and SD components of the action potentials recorded extracellularly around the cell when evoked by current pulses applied through the intracellular electrode; both the amplitudes of these IS and SD components and their timing with the IS and SD spikes, which were simultaneously recorded with the intracellular electrode, were then taken into account. The lowest thresholds (less than 2 muA) for the direct activation of cells were found nearest the initial segment of the axon. Their values increased to about 5 mu A at near-soma positions and to greater than 10 muA at near-dendrites positions about 150 mum away. 3. Transsynaptically evoked action potentials which were clearly set up by the preceding e.p.s.p.s appeared with latencies greater than 0-7 ms. When single current pulses were used, the lowest thresholds for transsynaptic spike activation were usually greater than 5-10 muA but they considerably decreased with repetitive stimuli. These thresholds were higher than the thresholds for the direct activation of cells within the region of the initial segment, of the same order of magnitude near the soma, and lower when the stimulating electrode was nearer the dendrites than the soma and generally at all larger distances from the cells. 4. All the observations on direct excitation of cells by extracellular stimuli (generation of the IS spike before the SD spike, lowest thresholds near the region of the initial segment of the axon, similar rates of increase in these thresholds with distance as for fibres) lead to the conclusion that the effects of the extracellular stimuli are exerted primarily via spread of current to the initial segment of the axon and its depolarization. 5. Late extracellular negativities presumably related to dendritic activation were observed in a few cells. These negativities were synchronous with late components of the intracellulary recorded action potentials.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Jankowska and A. Puczynska
Interneuronal Activity in Reflex Pathways from Group II Muscle Afferents Is Monitored by Dorsal Spinocerebellar Tract Neurons in the Cat
J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3615 - 3622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Sato, Y. Shimanuki, M. Saito, H. Toyoda, T. Nokubi, Y. Maeda, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Kang
Differential Columnar Processing in Local Circuits of Barrel and Insular Cortices
J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3076 - 3089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. M. ElBasiouny and V. K. Mushahwar
Modulation of motoneuronal firing behavior after spinal cord injury using intraspinal microstimulation current pulses: a modeling study
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2007; 103(1): 276 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Su, L. Yang, X. Zhang, A. Rojas, Y. Shi, and C. Jiang
High CO2 chemosensitivity versus wide sensing spectrum: a paradoxical problem and its solutions in cultured brainstem neurons
J. Physiol., February 1, 2007; 578(3): 831 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. T. Moritz, T. H. Lucas, S. I. Perlmutter, and E. E. Fetz
Forelimb Movements and Muscle Responses Evoked by Microstimulation of Cervical Spinal Cord in Sedated Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 110 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Gaunt, A. Prochazka, V. K. Mushahwar, L. Guevremont, and P. H. Ellaway
Intraspinal Microstimulation Excites Multisegmental Sensory Afferents at Lower Stimulus Levels Than Local {alpha}-Motoneuron Responses
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2995 - 3005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Barthelemy, H. Leblond, J. Provencher, and S. Rossignol
Nonlocomotor and Locomotor Hindlimb Responses Evoked by Electrical Microstimulation of the Lumbar Cord in Spinalized Cats
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3273 - 3292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Miocinovic, M. Parent, C. R. Butson, P. J. Hahn, G. S. Russo, J. L. Vitek, and C. C. McIntyre
Computational Analysis of Subthalamic Nucleus and Lenticular Fasciculus Activation During Therapeutic Deep Brain Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1569 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. J. Tehovnik, A. S. Tolias, F. Sultan, W. M. Slocum, and N. K. Logothetis
Direct and Indirect Activation of Cortical Neurons by Electrical Microstimulation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 512 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. Jankowska, S. A. Edgley, P. Krutki, and I. Hammar
Functional differentiation and organization of feline midlumbar commissural interneurones
J. Physiol., June 1, 2005; 565(2): 645 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. J Angel, E Jankowska, and D. A McCrea
Candidate interneurones mediating group I disynaptic EPSPs in extensor motoneurones during fictive locomotion in the cat
J. Physiol., March 1, 2005; 563(2): 597 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. C. McIntyre, W. M. Grill, D. L. Sherman, and N. V. Thakor
Cellular Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation: Model-Based Analysis of Activation and Inhibition
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1457 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Matsuyama and E. Jankowska
Coupling Between Feline Cerebellum (Fastigial Neurons) and Motoneurons Innervating Hindlimb Muscles
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1183 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Lemay and W. M. Grill
Modularity of Motor Output Evoked By Intraspinal Microstimulation in Cats
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 502 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Butovas and C. Schwarz
Spatiotemporal Effects of Microstimulation in Rat Neocortex: A Parametric Study Using Multielectrode Recordings
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3024 - 3039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Mohr, P. D. Roberts, and C. C. Bell
The Mormyromast Region of the Mormyrid Electrosensory Lobe. II. Responses to Input From Central Sources
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2003; 90(2): 1211 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 The Physiological Society.