HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murakami, M Articles by Shimoda, Y Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Murakami, M Articles by Shimoda, Y

1. Amacrine and ganglion cells in the carp retina were identified from such criteria as photoresponses, intracellular dye staining, responses to optic nerve stimulation and behaviour to a synapse blocking agent. 2. Responses of ganglion cells were accompanied by spike discharges., either facilitated or suppressed by photic stimulation. The cells were also invaded by antidromic impulses, which survived after chemical synapses had been blocked by application of atomized CoCl2 solution. In subsequent histology of the Procion-stained neurones, the cell bodies were found in the ganglion cell layer and the axons were often traced. 3. Amacrine cells were subdivided into two types. The first type gave rise to transient depolarizations at both on- and offsets of spot and annulus illuminations, usually being associated with spike discharges of which the amplitudes varied in different cells. In histology, the cell bodies of this type were situated in the inner nuclear layer and dendrites ramified in two or more discrete sublayers of the inner plexiform layer (the stratified amacrine cell of Cajal). 4. The second type of amacrine cells produced sustained responses during illumination, being associated with no spike but with small oscillatory wavelets. The cell bodies were situated in the inner nuclear layer and the dendrites ramified in a single sublayer of the inner plexiform layer (the monolayered amacrine cell). 5. An attempt was made to see the effect of activation of centrifugal fibres on amacrine cells, but almost all of about 200 cells examined did not respond to optic nerve stimulation. Only two cells produced, with long latency, a small post-synaptic depolarization which disappeared after chemical synapses in the retina had been blocked. It is considered that the physiological role of the centrifugal system is insignificant in the carp retina.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. K. Hoffpauir and E. L. Gleason Modulation of Synaptic Function in Retinal Amacrine Cells Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 45(4): 658 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Lee, Y. Hayashida, and A. T. Ishida Availability of Low-Threshold Ca2+ Current in Retinal Ganglion Cells J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3888 - 3901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-I. Watanabe, A. Koizumi, S. Matsunaga, J. W. Stocker, and A. Kaneko GABA-Mediated Inhibition Between Amacrine Cells in the Goldfish Retina J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1826 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Olson, A. Picones, and J. I. Korenbrot Developmental Switch in Excitability, Ca2+ and K+ Currents of Retinal Ganglion Cells and Their Dendritic Structure J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 2063 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Sakai, H. Machuca, and K.-I. Naka Processing of Color- and Noncolor-Coded Signals in the Gourami Retina. II. Amacrine Cells J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 2018 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]