HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Enroth-Cugell, C. Articles by Lennie, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Enroth-Cugell, C. Articles by Lennie, P.

Christina Enroth-Cugell^*, B. Gevene Hertz^* and P. Lennie

Departments of Biological Sciences and Electrical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.

1. The discharges of ganglion cells in the cat's retina were recorded under conditions intended to isolate the cone system.

2. Stiles' two-colour threshold technique permitted the photopic system to be studied when at its highest sensitivity. The absolute sensitivity of a ganglion cell, expressed in equivalent photons of _max at the cornea per impulse discharged, was about 2500 times less when driven by cones than when driven by rods. This ratio improves to around 200 when allowance is made for the much smaller fraction absorbed by cones of photons incident on the cornea.

3. The number of extra impulses discharged in response to a brief flash was approximately proportional to the number of photons in the flash, up to a limit.

4. There was a region in the middle of the receptive field within which the area of a test spot and its illumination for threshold varied inversely. A flash extending over the peripheral part of the receptive field raised threshold above its minimum, presumably as a result of surround antagonism. Assessed from area—threshold curves, the balance of centre-surround antagonism in the photopic receptive field did not seem to depend upon background illumination.

5. The threshold for a small (0·2°) flash confined to the middle of the receptive field was independent of background illumination until the background exceeded a particular level, the `dark light' (I_o). In different units this ranged about a mean of 7·89 log photons (560 nm equivalent) deg^-2 sec^-1. For backgrounds that exceeded I_o, threshold followed approximately Weber's law up to the highest illuminations that could be produced.

6. With test flashes that filled the centre of the receptive field, the Weber fraction (test flash illumination/background illumination) in some units fell below 1%.

7. Changes in the time course and latency of response accompanied the changes in sensitivity caused by alterations in background illumination. Responses of both X- and Y-cells became more transient and faster.

8. The loss of sensitivity to a test flash brought about by a steady background light depended upon the size of that light. Sensitivity varied inversely with background area within a central region that matched closely the summing area for test flashes.

Present address: Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, England.