J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 269, Issue 3 pp 797-810
Copyright © 1977 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spyer, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spyer, K. M.

The carotid chemoreceptor input to the respiratory neurones of the nucleus of tractus solitarius

J. Lipski, R. M. McAllen and K. M. Spyer*

Department of Physiology, the Medical School, Birmingham B15 2TJ

Department of Physiology, Warsaw Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland

1. An investigation has been made into the connexions between the carotid body chemoreceptors and the dorsal respiratory neurones of the cat's medulla.

2. In confirmation of previous work these neurones were found to be all inspiratory in firing pattern and to fall into two categories, R{alpha} (forty-four units) which fire only with the central inspiratory rhythm and Rbeta (thirty-two neurones) that are also excited by lung inflation. Both categories were shown to be excited by stimuli delivered to the carotid bodies during inspiration but, with a single exception, not during expiration.

3. When Rbeta neurones were made to fire tonically in expiration by maintained lung inflation, chemoreceptor activation inhibited this discharge in 7/11 cases, the remainder being unaffected.

4. Iontophoretically applied DL-homocysteic acid or glutamate made both R{alpha} and Rbeta neurones fire tonically in expiration. Chemoreceptor stimulation during expiration inhibited this activity in all neurones tested (nine R{alpha} and three Rbeta cells).

5. Using the measurement of the antidromic latency to spinal stimulation as an index of membrane potential, evidence was obtained that any subthreshold influence of the chemoreceptors on dorsal respiratory neurones during expiration was inhibitory (9/18 cases).

6. It is concluded that chemoreceptors do not even subliminally excite dorsal inspiratory neurones during expiration; such influence as they have then is inhibitory. Possible reasons for this difference in chemoreceptor influence during inspiration and expiration are discussed. It is suggested that chemoreceptor excitation reaches them only as part of an enhanced central inspiratory drive from an as yet unknown source.


* All communications to: Dr K. M. Spyer, Department of Physiology, The Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TJ.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
K. M. Spyer
To breathe or not to breathe? That is the question
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2009; 94(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. W. Taylor, D. Jordan, and J. H. Coote
Central Control of the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems and Their Interactions in Vertebrates
Physiol Rev, July 1, 1999; 79(3): 855 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 The Physiological Society.