HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cussons, P. D. Articles by Matthews, P. B. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cussons, P. D. Articles by Matthews, P. B. C.

1. The responsiveness of the spindle secondary ending to sinusoidal stretching has been studied using the soleus muscle of the anaesthetized cat. The sensitivity (impulses/sec firing per mm stretching) and the phase of the response were determined by computer averaging. The small linear range was studied at frequencies of 0·5-500 Hz, and also the larger non-linear range at 1 Hz.

2. In the linear range, stimulation of single fusimotor fibres (which were presumed to be static axons) approximately halved the sensitivity of the ending to low frequency stretching (up to 30 Hz), but did not produce any change in the phase of the response. Thus, from the point of view of motor function, fusimotor activity provides control of gain and a biasing signal, but not control of the relative sensitivity of the secondary ending to length and velocity.

3. In contrast, such stimulation slightly increased the responsiveness of the secondary ending to high-frequency stretching (100-500 Hz) and slightly advanced the phase of the response above that of the passive ending.

4. The results are discussed in relation to the effect of static fusimotor stimulation on the primary ending, and to findings on secondary endings in the decerebrate cat.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.R. Rosenberg, D.J. Murray-Smith, and A. Rigas An introduction to the application of system identification techniques to elements of the neuromuscular system Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, October 1, 1982; 4(4): 187 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]