J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 273, Issue 2 pp 405-425
Copyright © 1977 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, I. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, J. J.

Left ventricular mechanoreceptors: a haemodynamic study

I. J. Fox, D. A. Gerasch and J. J. Leonard

1. To study the function of the left ventricular mechanoreceptors, a working left ventricle preparation was devised in dogs which permitted control of pressure and flow of the isolated perfused coronary circulation and of the flow of the isolated, separately perfused systemic circulation. The systemic circulation was perfused at a constant rate so that changes in systemic pressure reflected changes in systemic resistance.

2. Increases in myocardial contractility produced by injection of catecholamines into the isolated, perfused coronary circulation produced a fall in the pressure (resistance) of the isolated, separately perfused (at a constant rate) systemic circulation.

3. Completeness of isolation of the coronary and systemic circulations was shown by the marked difference in appearance times between the reflex hypotensive responses from catecholamine injections into the isolated coronary circulation and the direct hypertensive response from a similar injection when the circulations were connected as well as by the marked difference between the pressure pulses recorded simultaneously on both sides of the aortic balloon separating the two circulations.

4. Myocardial beta receptor blockade produced by injection of propranolol into the isolated coronary circulation abolished or attenuated the changes in left ventricular myocardial contractility as well as the subsequent hypotensive responses following the similar injection of catecholamines.

5. Electrical stimulation of a sympathetic nerve innervating the heart resulted in increases in left ventricular myocardial contractility and subsequent systemic hypotensive responses indistinguishable from those following injection of catecholamines.

6. That distortion of the mechano- or stretch receptors in the left ventricular myocardium was the cause of the hypotensive responses was demonstrated by increasing left ventricular myocardial contractility by mechanically obstructing the left ventricular outflow which produced hypotensive responses similar to those following the injection of catecholamines or nerve stimulation.

7. Bilateral high cervical vagotomy abolished the hypotensive responses following injection of catecholamines into the isolated coronary circulation or following left ventricular outflow obstruction in all but one instance, indicating the importance of vagal fibres to the afferent arm of the reflex.

8. It is suggested that the left ventricular mechanoreceptors function normally to reduce the peripheral resistance in order to prepare the systemic circulation to receive the left ventricular output and, especially during exercise, to prepare the systemic circulation to receive the augmented cardiac output with a minimum alteration in the systemic blood pressure and to distribute this augmented output preferentially to the skeletal muscles.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Thaman, P. M. Elliott, J. S. Shah, B. Mist, L. Williams, R. T. Murphy, W. J. McKenna, and M. P. Frenneaux
Reversal of Inappropriate Peripheral Vascular Responses in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 883 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 The Physiological Society.