J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 286 pp 491-507
Copyright © 1979 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Normann, R A
Right arrow Articles by Perlman, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Normann, R A
Right arrow Articles by Perlman, I

The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones.

R A Normann and I Perlman

1. The photoresponses of light- and dark-adapted red and green cone photoreceptors were recorded intracellularly in the retina of the turtle, Pseduemys scripta elegans. Background illumination produced similar effects on both types of cones. 2. In response to the onset of a prolonged, steady background illumination the cone initially hyperpolarized to a peak which then sagged back to a steady-state polarization that was typically about one half the initial peak amplitude. This sag was observed for all backgrounds studied (dim as well as bright). 3. A resensitization was observed concomitantly with this sag; both the maximum increment and decrement responses grew in amplitude as light-adaptation proceeded. After about 2--3 min of background illumination, the amplitudes of these responses stabilized. 4. The dark-adapted cone produced graded responses to test pulses over a range of intensities spanning about 3.5 log units. The amplitudes of these responses were well fit by the relationship V = I.Vm/(I + sigma). 5. After 2--3 min of background illumination, 500 msec test pulses either brighter or dimmer than the background intensity were substituted for the background. The light-adapted intensity-response curves constructed from this data were similar to the dark-adapted curve but were shifted horizontally and slightly vertically, so that they still spanned about 3.5 log units of intensity. Thus, in the light-adapted cone, graded responses were elicited by a range of bright test pulses which would have produced saturated responses when delivered to the dark-adapted cone. 6. The 'off response' observed at the offset of the background became faster as the background intensity was increased. It also became faster with time following the onset of any particular background intensity. 7. It was concluded that cone sensitivity during any state of light-adaptation is determined by two mechanisms; response compression resulting from the instantaneous non-linearity between 'internal transmitter' concentration and membrane potential and a more active 'cellular adaptation' mechanism which is manifest as a shift in the intensity-response curve. In the steady-state condition of light-adaptation, most of the sensitivity changes are a result of the cellular adaptation mechanism. 8. Photopigment bleaching caused by the backgrounds, negative feed-back from horizontal cells and voltage dependent mechanisms in the cones could not account for this cellular adaptation. These effects of background illumination were interpreted in terms of the 'internal transmitter' hypothesis of phototransduction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
M. Comas, D.G.M. Beersma, K. Spoelstra, and S. Daan
Circadian Response Reduction in Light and Response Restoration in Darkness: A "Skeleton" Light Pulse PRC Study in Mice (Mus musculus)
J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 2007; 22(5): 432 - 444.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Chen, M. Wu, S. A. Sezate, and J. F. McGinnis
Light Threshold-Controlled Cone {alpha}-Transducin Translocation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3350 - 3355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
B. E. Knox and E. Solessio
Shedding Light On Cones
J. Gen. Physiol., March 27, 2006; 127(4): 355 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. C. Smith, J. Pokorny, B. B. Lee, and D. M. Dacey
Primate Horizontal Cell Dynamics: An Analysis of Sensitivity Regulation in the Outer Retina
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 545 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. J. Flynn, J. Kanicki, A. Badano, and W. R. Eyler
High-Fidelity Electronic Display of Digital Radiographs
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1653 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Kondo, Y. Miyake, C.-H. Piao, A. Tanikawa, M. Horiguchi, and H. Terasaki
Amplitude Increase of the Multifocal Electroretinogram during Light Adaptation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 1999; 40(11): 2633 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Barbur, L. Weiskrantz, and J. A. Harlow
The unseen color aftereffect of an unseen stimulus: Insight from blindsight into mechanisms of color afterimages
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11637 - 11641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. A. J. Duke and D. Bray
Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors
PNAS, August 31, 1999; 96(18): 10104 - 10108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 The Physiological Society.