J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 312 pp 81-96
Copyright © 1981 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hagbarth, K.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hagbarth, K.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. R.

Grouped spindle and electromyographic responses to abrupt wrist extension movements in man

K.-E. Hagbarth, J. V. Hägglund, E. U. Wallin and R. R. Young*

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

1. Different techniques were used to generate sudden ramp extension movements of the wrist while the subjects were either relaxed or maintaining a weak voluntary contraction in the wrist flexors. Afferent responses to the displacements were recorded with a tungsten micro-electrode inserted into a fascicle of the median nerve supplying one of the wrist flexor muscles, and e.m.g. responses were recorded with needle electrodes inserted into the same muscle.

2. With the wrist flexors either relaxed or contracting, extensions at 100-200°/sec for 60-70 msec (generated by either an hydraulic motor or a torque motor) produced segmented afferent responses with two to four afferent bursts, separated by intervals of 20-30 msec. The successive neural peaks, occuring during the stretch phase, were correlated to mechanical vibrations sensed by a strain gauge and sometimes also by a wrist goniometer. With the flexor muscles contracting, the successive peaks in the neurogram were followed by similar peaks in the e.m.g, the delay between neural and e.m.g. peaks being 20-25 msec.

3. Small abrupt extension movements of 1-2° lasting only 10-15 msec often produced segmented afferent responses with one neural burst occuring during the stretch phase and another 15-20 msec later, corresponding to a mechanical oscillatory event succeeding the stretch. The oscillation and the second neural burst were not present with small extension movements of smooth onset and halt. With the flexor muscles contracting, stimuli producing one afferent burst produced only one e.m.g. peak, whereas double-peaked afferent discharges produced double-peaked e.m.g. responses, the delay between individual neural e.m.g. peaks being 20-25 msec.

4. Similar segmentation of the neural stretch responses was seen when abrupt displacements were produced by electrically induced muscle twitches, by manual pulls on a spring attached to the hand or by the subject making fast voluntary wrist extensions. This grouping of afferent discharges was seen in both multi-unit and in single-unit recordings from fibres identified as group Ia afferents.

5. It is concluded that mechanical vibrations in the moving parts are initiated by abrupt joint movements and that these vibrations are sensed by the primary endings. With initial background contraction in the stretched muscles, synchronous volleys of spindle discharges produce, via segmental reflex arcs, modulation of the e.m.g. with the appearance of two or three e.m.g. peaks separated by intervals of 20-30 msec. Possible causes for the mechanical oscillations are discussed.

6. For imposed movements with a duration of 60-70 msec the successive e.m.g. peaks caused a fused reflex contraction, appearing as a torque trace deflexion, starting at about the time when the movement ended and reaching its peak within about 40 msec. With longer-lasting movements the mechanical reflex response accompanying the successive e.m.g. bursts, appeared as a decelerative force, starting to oppose the ongoing movement about 60 msec after its start. Mechanical consequences of stretch reflex contractions starting after, rather than during, the stretch movement are discussed.


* On sabbatical leave from the Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass. 02114, U.S.A. On a Faculty Scholarship from the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Kouzaki, M. Shinohara, K. Masani, and T. Fukunaga
Force fluctuations are modulated by alternate muscle activity of knee extensor synergists during low-level sustained contraction
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2004; 97(6): 2121 - 2131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Corden, O.C.J. Lippold, K. Buchanan, and C. Norrington
Long-Latency Component of the Stretch Reflex in Human Muscle Is Not Mediated by Intramuscular Stretch Receptors
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 184 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 The Physiological Society.