| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, U.S.A.
1. The sensation of stereoscopic depth rests on the central neural processing of signals evoked by the two retinal images of a single object in space. It was our purpose in this study to investigate in the behaving monkey the binocular cortical mechanisms that might underlie the ability to recognize the relative position and motion of objects in three-dimensional space.
2. The large majority of neurones studied in A17 (n = 245), and all neurones studied in A18 (n = 21), were functionally connected to both eyes, and a substantial proportion (75%) of these neurones were sensitive to positional binocular disparity. On the basis of their depth sensitivity profile, four types of stereoscopic neurones were recognized, each type characteristically sensitive to visual contours appearing in depth farther than, at, or nearer than the point of binocular fixation.
3. Tuned excitatory and tuned inhibitory neurones display binocular facilitation and binocular suppression respectively, to stimuli over a narrow range of small disparities, including zero disparity, with more or less pronounced reciprocal responses to stimuli with larger disparities. These neurones, the tuned excitatory in particular, may be considered to be the substrate for central fusion of slightly disparate retinal images, and to provide the basis for the neural mechanisms leading to three-dimensional perception of objects with high stereoacuity (fine stereopsis).
4. Two other sets of reciprocally organized neurones, near and far neurones, respond differentially to wider ranges of crossed and uncrossed disparities. The near neurones are activated by stimuli in front of and inhibited by stimuli behind fixation. The far neurones have the reciprocal depth sensitivity. These neural elements may be regarded as active in the processing of binocular information leading to qualitative depth estimates in the presence of double vision (coarse stereopsis).
5. Binocular response selectivity for the direction of object motion-in-depth depends chiefly upon monocular sensitivity to the direction of retinal image motion, a property we observed in about one half of the foveal neurones. Cortical neurones with the same directional sensitivity for monocular stimuli in both eyes display coarse binocular selectivity for the trajectory of object motion but provide unambiguous signals for the direction of motion, towards the right or towards the left within the depth domain of the neurone. A small group of neurones (3%) displays opposite and opponent directional sensitivity for stimuli in the two eyes. Their binocular response, therefore, is best when the two retinal images move in opposite directions at the same time, a condition that obtains with motion directly towards or away from the animal with little or no lateral movement. These directionally dual-opponent cells usually have coarse or no selectivity for position-in-depth.
6. The results of this study indicate that basic mechanisms for the stereoscopic analysis of the position (static) and motion (dynamic) of objects in space relative to one another are present at early stages of binocular interaction in the visual cortex of primates, and that they are in effective action during normal binocular vision.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Nienborg, H. Bridge, A. J. Parker, and B. G. Cumming Neuronal Computation of Disparity in V1 Limits Temporal Resolution for Detecting Disparity Modulation J. Neurosci., November 2, 2005; 25(44): 10207 - 10219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Washio, Y. Suzuki, M. Sawa, and K. Ohtsuka Gain of Human Torsional Optokinetic Nystagmus Depends on Horizontal Disparity Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 133 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Tychsen, A. M. F. Wong, P. Foeller, and D. Bradley Early Versus Delayed Repair of Infantile Strabismus in Macaque Monkeys: II. Effects on Motion Visually Evoked Responses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming Ocular Dominance Predicts Neither Strength Nor Class of Disparity Selectivity With Random-Dot Stimuli in Primate V1 J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1271 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Grossberg How does the cerebral cortex work? development, learning, attention, and 3-D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 47 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.J.D. Prince, A. D. Pointon, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker Quantitative Analysis of the Responses of V1 Neurons to Horizontal Disparity in Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 191 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.J.D. Prince, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker Range and Mechanism of Encoding of Horizontal Disparity in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 209 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Chen, Y. Wang, and N. Qian Modeling V1 Disparity Tuning to Time-Varying Stimuli J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 143 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Takemura, Y. Inoue, K. Kawano, C. Quaia, and F. A. Miles Single-Unit Activity in Cortical Area MST Associated With Disparity-Vergence Eye Movements: Evidence for Population Coding J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 2245 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Busettini, E. J. Fitzgibbon, and F. A. Miles Short-Latency Disparity Vergence in Humans J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1129 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Bakin, K. Nakayama, and C. D. Gilbert Visual Responses in Monkey Areas V1 and V2 to Three-Dimensional Surface Configurations J. Neurosci., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 8188 - 8198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Eifuku and R. H. Wurtz Response to Motion in Extrastriate Area MSTl: Disparity Sensitivity J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2462 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Erwin and K. D. Miller The Subregion Correspondence Model of Binocular Simple Cells J. Neurosci., August 15, 1999; 19(16): 7212 - 7229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information I. Simple Cells J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 891 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. G. Cumming and A. J. Parker Binocular Neurons in V1 of Awake Monkeys Are Selective for Absolute, Not Relative, Disparity J. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 19(13): 5602 - 5618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Smith III, Y. M. Chino, J. Ni, W. H. Ridder III, and M.L.J. Crawford Binocular Spatial Phase Tuning Characteristics of Neurons in the Macaque Striate Cortex J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 351 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Smith III, Y. Chino, J. Ni, and H. Cheng Binocular Combination of Contrast Signals by Striate Cortical Neurons in the Monkey J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 366 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. M. Chino, E. L. Smith III, S. Hatta, and H. Cheng Postnatal Development of Binocular Disparity Sensitivity in Neurons of the Primate Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., January 1, 1997; 17(1): 296 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
