HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dubs, A Articles by Srinivasan, M V Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dubs, A Articles by Srinivasan, M V

1. The contrast sensitivity of the optomotor response of the fly Musca domestica was measured using a moving sinusoidal grating as the stimulus. In parallel experiments intracellular recordings were made from photoreceptors and first order visual interneurones to to determine their responses to the same threshold stimuli. Measurements of the spatial modulation transfer function for photoreceptors confirm that the optics of the eye were intact during recordings. 2. At the lowest intensity at which one can obtain an optomotor response, the photoreceptor signal is a train of discrete depolarizations, or bumps. With constant intensity stimuli, the temporal distribution of bumps followed the Poisson distribution with a mean rate of proportional to luminance. The mean bump rate at the threshold intensity for a behavioural response is 1.7 +/- 0.7 s-1 (mean +/- S.D., n = 25). 3. Calibrations and the statistical properties of the bump train indicate that a bump represents one effective photon, implying that the bump : photon ratios are quantum capture efficiencies. 4. At low intensities the first order interneurones (the large monopolar cells or LMCs) show hyperpolarizing bumps each triggered by a receptor bump. Using a point source stimulus, centred in the field of view, the LMC bump rate is six times that in a single receptor viewing the same stimulus, as expected from the known projection of six receptor axons to each LMC. When using an extended stimulus (the grating), the bump rate is 18-20 times that in receptors. Comparison with earlier work suggests that this increased lateral summation of receptor inputs to LMCs only occurs at very low intensities. 5. In both receptor and LMCs the amplitudes and wave forms of bumps depend upon the position of a point source stimulus within the field of view. With the light in the periphery of the field the bumps are smaller and slower than when the light is in the centre. This difference in response suggests that spatial stimulation is brought about by lateral interactions, possibly between receptors. 6. At higher mean intensities the signal-to-noise ratios in receptors responding to the appropriate threshold stimuli increase with intensity. This is suggestive of a decrease in the extent of spatial and/or temporal summation in the optomotor pathway.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Pumir, J. Graves, R. Ranganathan, and B. I. Shraiman Systems analysis of the single photon response in invertebrate photoreceptors PNAS, July 29, 2008; 105(30): 10354 - 10359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Brenner, S. P. Strong, R. Koberle, W. Bialek, and R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck Synergy in a Neural Code Neural Comput., July 1, 2000; 12(7): 1531 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text]