J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 320 pp 363-379
Copyright © 1981 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolton, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolton, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, R. J.

Evidence that histamine and carbachol may open the same ion channels in longitudinal smooth muscle of guinea-pig ileum

T. B. Bolton, J. P. Clark, K. Kitamura and R. J. Lang

Department of Pharmacology, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE

1. Membrane potential was recorded intracellularly by micro-electrode in separated longitudinal muscle of guinea-pig ileum. Electrotonic potentials were evoked in longitudinal strips by passing current between large external electrodes in the partition chamber.

2. Histamine increased the frequency of action potential discharge at low concentrations and depolarized the membrane. At higher concentrations it caused substantial depolarization and action potential discharge was abolished. Carbachol had similar actions but the maximal depolarization by carbachol (using 10-4 M) was some 4-5 mV greater than maximal depolarization by histamine (using 10-4 M).

3. The change in size of evoked electrotonic potentials was used to estimate the effects of carbachol and histamine on the conductance of the smooth muscle membrane. The equilibrium potentials for histamine and carbachol depolarizations were estimated from their relative effects on potential and conductance and were found to be not significantly different; measurements of the effects on conductance showed that 10-4 M-histamine increased conductance about 8-fold whilst 10-4 M-carbachol had a much greater effect on conductance. This difference could explain the differing maximal depolarizing effects of these agents if both were assumed to open channels having the same ionic selectivity (i.e. equilibrium potential).

4. The efflux of 42K was studied in separated strips of longitudinal ileal muscle from guinea-pig. In the presence of a concentration of carbachol (2 x 10-5 M or 10-4 M) having a maximal effect on 42K efflux rate, histamine (10-4 M) did not increase efflux further although 120 mM-potassium did so. Experiments with the irreversible muscarinic receptor blocker, propylbenzilylcholine mustard, indicated that the number of muscarinic receptors did not limit the 42K efflux response to carbachol and it was suggested that the response was limited by the availability of ion channels which could be opened by activated muscarinic receptors.

5. Contractions to histamine and carbachol in 120 mM-potassium depolarizing solution were followed upon washing by a relaxation below basal tension. Carbachol, but not histamine, showed a pronounced and long lasting secondary contraction following this relaxation.

6. These results are consistent with the idea that activated histamine and activated muscarinic receptors open the same ion channels in the smooth muscle membrane to produce depolarization, increased action potential discharge and contraction, although muscarinic receptors can open more of these. However, there was evidence that the opening of these channels is not the only pathway between receptor activation and contraction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
L E Sander, A Lorentz, G Sellge, M Coeffier, M Neipp, T Veres, T Frieling, P N Meier, M P Manns, and S C Bischoff
Selective expression of histamine receptors H1R, H2R, and H4R, but not H3R, in the human intestinal tract
Gut, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. J. Hill, C. R. Ganellin, H. Timmerman, J. C. Schwartz, N. P. Shankley, J. M. Young, W. Schunack, R. Levi, and H. L. Haas
International Union of Pharmacology. XIII. Classification of Histamine Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 1997; 49(3): 253 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Wallace, C. Chen, and P. D. Marley
Histamine promotes excitability in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells by inhibiting an M-current
J. Physiol., May 1, 2002; 540(3): 921 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 The Physiological Society.