J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 323 pp 393-402
Copyright © 1982 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chofflon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rüegg, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chofflon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rüegg, D. G.

A transcortical loop demonstrated by stimulation of low-threshold muscle afferents in the awake monkey

M. Chofflon, J.-M. Lachat and D. G. Rüegg

Institute of Physiology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland

1. The hypothesis that a transcortical loop can be activated by electrical stimulation of low-threshold muscle afferents was tested. The effect of these afferents on the excitability of motoneurones was measured with the monosynaptic spinal reflex (H-reflex).

2. Four monkeys were trained to maintain a constant tonic activity in the soleus muscle so that the amplitude of evoked H-reflexes was constant. The intensity of conditioning stimuli was just subthreshold for direct or reflex electromyographic responses. The intensity of the test stimuli was adjusted to evoke an H-reflex of maximal amplitude. The amplitude of the H-reflex was recorded for different intervals between conditioning and test stimuli (10-1000 msec).

3. The excitability curve obtained showed three components: (1) an early excitatory process, F1, at intervals of 10-20 msec, (2) a late excitatory process, F2, at intervals of 40-80 msec and (3) a short latency depression of about 400 msec duration, on which F1 and F2 were superimposed.

4. F2 was selectively abolished during cooling of the contralateral motor cortex, after an irreversible lesion of the motor cortex, and after pyramidotomy; however, F1 and the inhibition remained unchanged.

5. The conduction time from the tibial nerve to the somatosensory cortex (SI), the cortical delay between SI and motor cortex, and the conduction time from motor cortex to the soleus muscle were measured in an anaesthetized animal. The sum of these values as an estimate of the transcortical loop time was 5 msec shorter than the latency of F2.

6. It is concluded that a transcortical loop can be activated by electrical stimulation of low-threshold muscle afferents and, by analogy, also by mechanical perturbations applied during a motor task.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Taube, C. Leukel, M. Schubert, M. Gruber, T. Rantalainen, and A. Gollhofer
Differential Modulation of Spinal and Corticospinal Excitability During Drop Jumps
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1243 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 The Physiological Society.