J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 329 pp 281-296
Copyright © 1982 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Sousa, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grosso, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Sousa, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Grosso, A.

Osmotic water flow across the abdominal skin of the toad Bufo marinus: effect of vasopressin and isoprenaline

R. C. de Sousa and Alda Grosso

Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

1. Net water flow Jw, was measured across the abdominal skin of the toad Bufo marinus with a volumetric, automatic technique that allows for averaging Jw over time intervals as short as 1 sec.

2. Basal Jw was very stable and corresponded to a coefficient of osmotic flow, LPD, of ca. 15 x 10-7 cm sec-1 atm-1 (or to an osmotic water permeability coefficient, Pf, of 20 µm sec-1).

3. Both vasopressin and the beta-adrenergic agonist, isoprenaline, triggered high hydrosmotic responses that could lead to Pf values exceeding 250 µm sec-1. The effect of isoprenaline was very reproducible while that of vasopressin varied considerably.

4. Methohexital and propranolol selectively inhibited the hydrosmotic effects of vasopressin and isoprenaline, respectively, whereas amiloride and ouabain had no effect.

5. Mutual inhibition was found between vasopressin and isoprenaline in skins very sensitive to vasopressin. In less sensitive skins isoprenaline further increased Jw despite exposure of the epithelia to supramaximal concentrations of vasopressin.

6. Differential reactivity to vasopressin was found between the skin and the bladder taken from the same toad. In some instances, the bladder responded normally to vasopressin while the skin was totally unresponsive, suggesting the presence of osmoregulatory mechanisms exerting a local modulation of the vasopressin action in different target epithelia of the same animal.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. T. Hanna-Mitchell and E. M. Gebruers
The hydroosmotic response of frog urinary bladder to serosal hypertonicity is dependent on adenylate cyclase for its maintenance and affected by [Cl-]o changes
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R213 - R223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. Hasegawa, H. Tanii, M. Suzuki, and S. Tanaka
Regulation of Water Absorption in the Frog Skins by Two Vasotocin-Dependent Water-Channel Aquaporins, AQP-h2 and AQP-h3
Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 4087 - 4096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 The Physiological Society.