HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hall, L A Articles by McCloskey, D I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hall, L A Articles by McCloskey, D I

The angular displacements necessary for 70% correct detection were determined in normal subjects at the shoulder and elbow joints and at the terminal joint of the middle finger. Angular velocities of displacement between 0.125 degrees and 160 degrees/s were tested. Each joint was tested in the mid-range of its normal excursion. The joints were carefully supported for testing and the muscles acting at the joints were relaxed. When assessed in terms of angular displacements and angular velocities, proprioceptive performance at the shoulder and elbow joints was superior to that at the finger joint. Optimal performance at the finger joint was attained over the range of angular velocities from 10 degrees to 80 degrees/s. Optimal performance at both more proximal joints was optimal over a wider range (2 degrees-80 degrees/s). Active pointing movements made without vision of the moving part were performed at each joint at velocities within the range of optimal proprioceptive performance. However, when detection levels and displacement velocities were expressed in terms of linear displacements and velocities at the finger tip for all three joints, the finger joint gave the best performance and the shoulder the worst. In practical terms, therefore, displacements of a given linear extent are best detected if they move distal joints and worst if they move proximal joints. For the elbow and finger joints the detection level and velocity data were expressed also in terms of proportional changes in the lengths of muscles operating at these joints, and as proportional changes in the distance between the points of attachment of the joint capsules. Analysis in terms of proportional changes of muscle length showed remarkably similar performance levels at both joints. This suggests that intramuscular receptors are important determinants of proprioceptive performance. Analysis in terms of joint capsular displacement did not unify the data: on this form of analysis proprioceptive performance at the elbow joint was superior.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Sturnieks, J. R. Wright, and R. C. Fitzpatrick Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints J. Physiol., December 15, 2007; 585(3): 833 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Gritsenko, N. I. Krouchev, and J. F. Kalaska Afferent Input, Efference Copy, Signal Noise, and Biases in Perception of Joint Angle During Active Versus Passive Elbow Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1140 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. E. Brown, D. A. Rosenbaum, and R. L. Sainburg Limb Position Drift: Implications for Control of Posture and Movement J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3105 - 3118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Maschke, C. M. Gomez, P. J. Tuite, and J. Konczak Dysfunction of the basal ganglia, but not the cerebellum, impairs kinaesthesia Brain, October 1, 2003; 126(10): 2312 - 2322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-T. Weiler, G. Pap, and F. Awiszus The role of joint afferents in sensory processing in osteoarthritic knees Rheumatology, August 1, 2000; 39(8): 850 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Auge II and D. S. Morrison Assessment of the Infraspinatus Spinal Stretch Reflex in the Normal, Athletic, and Multidirectionally Unstable Shoulder Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2000; 28(2): 206 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]