HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lamb, G D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lamb, G D

Psychophysical experiments were designed to assess the tactile discriminative abilities of human subjects when touching textured surfaces. Plastic strips were produced which had raised dots in a square arrangement (standard surface) or in one of a number of rectangular arrangements (modified surfaces) in which the spacing of the dots differed from the standard surface by some constant amount in one direction. Subjects were presented with pairs of surfaces and asked to discriminate whether each pair consisted of (a), two identical standard surfaces, or (b), a standard surface and a modified surface. Performance measurements were analysed using decision theory. When subjects moved their fingers over the surfaces (active touch) their responses were virtually unbiased, and there was a linear relationship between discriminative performance and the difference between the spacing of the dots on the two surfaces. At the 75% correct level, subjects could distinguish surfaces in which the period of the dots differed by only 2%. Performance was virtually independent of the method of movement used, despite large differences in the velocity profiles of the various movements. Experiments in which the surfaces were moved under the subject's stationary finger (passive touch) displayed the same linear relationship between performance and period difference as in the active-touch experiments. Furthermore, the discriminative performance levels were very similar in the two types of experiments. In the passive-touch experiments, subjects could distinguish smaller differences in period in the surface dimension parallel to (along) the direction of movement than they could distinguish in the dimension perpendicular to (across) the direction of movement. The hypothesis is advanced that normal active discrimination of surfaces is made possible by using similar movements in successive surface contacts and a relatively simple neural code.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. M. Knutsen, M. Pietr, and E. Ahissar Haptic Object Localization in the Vibrissal System: Behavior and Performance. J. Neurosci., August 15, 2006; 26(33): 8451 - 8464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Gamzu and E. Ahissar Importance of Temporal Cues for Tactile Spatial- Frequency Discrimination J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7416 - 7427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Yoshioka, B. Gibb, A. K. Dorsch, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson Neural Coding Mechanisms Underlying Perceived Roughness of Finely Textured Surfaces J. Neurosci., September 1, 2001; 21(17): 6905 - 6916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Cascio and K. Sathian Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness J. Neurosci., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 5289 - 5296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]