HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jankowska, E Articles by McCrea, D A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jankowska, E Articles by McCrea, D A

The possibility was investigated that group Ia muscle spindle afferents and group Ib tendon organ afferents influence spinal motoneurones via shared neuronal pathways. Mutual facilitation of actions of these afferents at a premotoneuronal level has been taken as evidence that they use the same interneurones to evoke post-synaptic potentials (p.s.p.s) in motoneurones. Inhibitory p.s.p.s (i.p.s.p.s) or excitatory p.s.p.s (e.p.s.p.s) were evoked in motoneurones by selective activation of group Ia afferents or group Ib afferents. P.s.p.s following stimulation of both Ia and Ib afferents were then compared with the arithmetic sum of p.s.p.s evoked by each of them separately. When the former were larger the difference was used as a measure of synaptic actions mediated by interneurones co-excited by Ia and Ib afferents. Both excitatory and inhibitory pathways to motoneurones have been found to be shared by Ia and Ib afferents, although the proportion of interneurones actually used in common by these afferents could not be established. The latencies of post-synaptic actions mediated by such interneurones indicated that they were evoked disynaptically or trisynaptically. The study leads to two main conclusions: that group Ia muscle spindle afferents, and in consequence also fusimotor systems, may modulate the reflex action of tendon organs, and that the two groups of afferents are a source of information in a common feed-back system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Barriere, J. Simmers, and D. Combes Multiple Mechanisms for Integrating Proprioceptive Inputs That Converge on the Same Motor Pattern-Generating Network J. Neurosci., August 27, 2008; 28(35): 8810 - 8820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Rybak, K. Stecina, N. A. Shevtsova, and D. A. McCrea Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 641 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-P. Cote, A. Menard, and J.-P. Gossard Spinal Cats on the Treadmill: Changes in Load Pathways J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2789 - 2796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Enriquez-Denton, H. Morita, L.O.D. Christensen, N. Petersen, T. Sinkjaer, and J. B. Nielsen Interaction Between Peripheral Afferent Activity and Presynaptic Inhibition of Ia Afferents in the Cat J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1664 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Gandevia Spinal and Supraspinal Factors in Human Muscle Fatigue Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1725 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Prochazka, D. Gillard, and D. J. Bennett Positive Force Feedback Control of Muscles J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3226 - 3236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Prochazka, D. Gillard, and D. J. Bennett Implications of Positive Feedback in the Control of Movement J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3237 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]