J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 353 pp 375-391
Copyright © 1984 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreev, A A
Right arrow Articles by Vulfius, C A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreev, A A
Right arrow Articles by Vulfius, C A

Two-component desensitization of nicotinic receptors induced by acetylcholine agonists in Lymnaea stagnalis neurones.

A A Andreev, B N Veprintsev and C A Vulfius

The kinetics of desensitization induced by different agonists of acetylcholine (ACh) as well as the kinetics of recovery from densensitization, have been studied using the voltage-clamp technique in isolated, identified Lymnaea stagnalis neurones. Desensitization follows the sum of two exponentials: one fast and one slow. The time constant of the fast desensitization component (tau Ids) under ACh application is in the range of seconds at room temperature (18-23 degrees C). It increases upon cooling (Q10 = 2.8 +/- 0.9), decreases with increasing ACh concentration and is independent of membrane voltage. The time constant of the slow component of densensitization (tau Ids) is in the range of tens of seconds. It decreases with increasing drug concentration and is weakly dependent upon temperature (Q10 = 1.3 +/- 0.4). The relative amplitude of the fast component, estimated by back extrapolation to the position of the peak current, increases with agonist concentration and decreases upon cooling. Recovery from desensitization follows the sum of two exponentials with time constants (tau Ir and tau IIr) of the order of seconds and minutes, respectively. Cooling prolongs the slow component (Q10 of tau IIr is approx. 3) and reduces its contribution during recovery. A comparison of the desensitization induced by various agonists indicates that for the small monoquaternary agonists the onset and recovery of desensitization resemble the onset and recovery observed with ACh. For more bulky agonists, like ethoxysebacylcholine, sebacylcholine and suberylcholine, the decay of the response during prolonged application of the agonist may involve an additional blocking process.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 The Physiological Society.