J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 385 pp 393-413
Copyright © 1987 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edgley, S A
Right arrow Articles by Jankowska, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edgley, S A
Right arrow Articles by Jankowska, E

Field potentials generated by group II muscle afferents in the middle lumbar segments of the cat spinal cord.

S A Edgley and E Jankowska

Department of Physiology, University of Göteborg, Sweden.

1. A powerful projection from group II muscle afferents of hind-limb muscles to the 3rd, 4th and 5th segments of the lumbar spinal cord has been demonstrated by focal synaptic field potential recording. 2. Field potentials were found at two locations: one in the dorsal horn (Rexed's laminae IV and V) and the other in the intermediate zone and ventral horn (Rexed's laminae VII and VIII). In the dorsal horn the field potentials were exceptionally large and were evoked only by group II afferents. At more ventral locations, they were smaller and were sometimes preceded by small field potentials evoked by group I afferents. 3. At both locations field potentials could be evoked by stimulation of a number of hind-limb muscle nerves at strengths sufficient to activate group II afferents. However, some nerves consistently evoked more powerful effects than others and the largest potentials were from the nerves to quadriceps, sartorius and to the pretibial flexor muscles (tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum longus). Activation of articular afferents (from the knee joint nerve) or Pacinian corpuscle afferents (from the interosseous nerve) evoked small field potentials at some locations. 4. In the dorsal horn the latency of the field potentials was so short that they must have been generated monosynaptically. Field potentials in the ventral horn had longer latencies, by 0.5-1.0 ms, but they also appear to have been monosynaptically evoked by slowly conducting intraspinal collaterals. This conclusion is based primarily on the effects of intraspinal stimulation which was found to antidromically activate afferents with the appropriate latencies and thresholds. 5. Evidence is presented that the dorsal and ventral field potentials are generated by afferents whose receptors can be activated by small (less than 100 micron) muscle stretches.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Delivet-Mongrain, H. Leblond, and S. Rossignol
Effects of Localized Intraspinal Injections of a Noradrenergic Blocker on Locomotion of High Decerebrate Cats
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 907 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Jankowska and A. Puczynska
Interneuronal Activity in Reflex Pathways from Group II Muscle Afferents Is Monitored by Dorsal Spinocerebellar Tract Neurons in the Cat
J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3615 - 3622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Durbaba, A. Taylor, P. H. Ellaway, and S. Rawlinson
Spinal projection of spindle afferents of the longissimus lumborum muscles of the cat
J. Physiol., April 15, 2007; 580(2): 659 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Barthelemy, H. Leblond, and S. Rossignol
Characteristics and Mechanisms of Locomotion Induced by Intraspinal Microstimulation and Dorsal Root Stimulation in Spinal Cats
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1986 - 2000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Barthelemy, H. Leblond, J. Provencher, and S. Rossignol
Nonlocomotor and Locomotor Hindlimb Responses Evoked by Electrical Microstimulation of the Lumbar Cord in Spinalized Cats
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3273 - 3292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Cabaj, K. Stecina, and E. Jankowska
Same Spinal Interneurons Mediate Reflex Actions of Group Ib and Group II Afferents and Crossed Reticulospinal Actions
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3911 - 3922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
E. Jankowska, S. A. Edgley, P. Krutki, and I. Hammar
Functional differentiation and organization of feline midlumbar commissural interneurones
J. Physiol., June 1, 2005; 565(2): 645 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. J. Dougherty, B. A. Bannatyne, E. Jankowska, P. Krutki, and D. J. Maxwell
Membrane Receptors Involved in Modulation of Responses of Spinal Dorsal Horn Interneurons Evoked by Feline Group II Muscle Afferents
J. Neurosci., January 19, 2005; 25(3): 584 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Huang, B. R. Noga, P. A. Carr, B. Fedirchuk, and L. M. Jordan
Spinal Cholinergic Neurons Activated During Locomotion: Localization and Electrophysiological Characterization
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 3537 - 3547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Dessem, R. Donga, and P. Luo
Primary- and Secondary-Like Jaw-Muscle Spindle Afferents Have Characteristic Topographic Distributions
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 2925 - 2944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. C. Aggelopoulos, S. Chakrabarty, and S. A. Edgley
Evoked Excitability Changes at the Terminals of Midlumbar Premotor Interneurons in the Cat Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci., February 15, 1997; 17(4): 1512 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 The Physiological Society.