J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 400 pp 101-111
Copyright © 1988 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edin, B B
Right arrow Articles by Vallbo, A B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edin, B B
Right arrow Articles by Vallbo, A B

Stretch sensitization of human muscle spindles.

B B Edin and A B Vallbo

Department of Physiology, Umeå University, Sweden.

1. Sixty-seven afferents from the finger extensor muscles were consecutively recorded by microneurography. 2. The units were classified as primary or secondary muscle spindle afferents or Golgi tendon organ afferents on the basis of their responses to ramp-and-hold stretches, sinusoidals superimposed on ramp-and-hold stretches, maximal twitch contractions and isometric contractions and relaxations. 3. The muscle was repeatedly stretched and then either kept short or long for a few seconds followed by a slow ramp stretch. The responses of the muscle afferents to the slow stretch were compared under the two conditions. 4. Thirty out of thirty-eight units classified as primary spindle afferents and four out of eleven units classified as secondary afferents showed an enhanced response to the slow ramp when the muscle had been kept short compared to the response when the muscle had been kept long. 5. None of the eighteen Golgi tendon organ afferents showed any difference in this respect. 6. It is concluded that stretch sensitization does occur in human muscle spindles and, when present, constitutes firm evidence of the afferent originating from a muscle spindle rather than a Golgi tendon organ. In addition, due to differences in the response characteristics of primaries and secondaries, the test may aid in separating muscle spindle primary afferents from secondary afferents.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
E. Naito
Sensing Limb Movements in The Motor Cortex: How Humans Sense Limb Movement
Neuroscientist, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Naito, H. H. Ehrsson, S. Geyer, K. Zilles, and P. E. Roland
Illusory Arm Movements Activate Cortical Motor Areas: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
J. Neurosci., July 15, 1999; 19(14): 6134 - 6144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 The Physiological Society.