J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 412 pp 113-122
Copyright © 1989 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giniatullin, R A
Right arrow Articles by Vyskocil, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giniatullin, R A
Right arrow Articles by Vyskocil, F

Development of desensitization during repetitive end-plate activity and single end-plate currents in frog muscle.

R A Giniatullin, G Khamitov, R Khazipov, L G Magazanik, E E Nikolsky, V A Snetkov and F Vyskocil

Kazan Medical Institute, USSR.

1. The amplitudes of end-plate currents (EPCs) in short trains of fifteen to seventeen EPCs at 10 Hz were depressed in the presence of 10 microM-proadifen when acetylcholinesterase (AChE) was inhibited. 2. The proadifen-induced EPC depression was voltage-dependent and the effect was more pronounced at negative membrane potentials. 3. In the presence of proadifen, the mean amplitude of miniature end-plate currents (MEPCs) was reduced by 36% 5 s after the EPC train as compared with MEPCs before the train. 4. Without proadifen, but with inhibited AChE, an increase of temperature from 20 to 26 degrees C and elevation of external Ca2+ from 1.8 to 2.5 mM led to EPC amplitude depression in the train, which was also potential-dependent. 5. After AChE inhibition, proadifen (10 microM) progressively shortened MEPC decay without significant reduction of amplitude up to 40 min of exposition. MEPCs were not affected by proadifen when AChE was active. 6. It is concluded that these postsynaptic effects of proadifen can be explained neither by its action on the resting acetylcholine receptors (AChR) nor on open ion channels but are due to its desensitization-promoting action.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. A. Giniatullin, E. M. Sokolova, S. Di Angelantonio, A. Skorinkin, M. V. Talantova, and A. Nistri
Rapid Relief of Block by Mecamylamine of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors of Rat Chromaffin Cells In Vitro: An Electrophysiological and Modeling Study
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2000; 58(4): 778 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Moyer and E. van Lunteren
Effect of Phasic Activation on Endplate Potential in Rat Diaphragm
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3030 - 3040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 The Physiological Society.