HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by English, A W Articles by Weeks, O I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by English, A W Articles by Weeks, O I

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

1. Experiments were conducted to test the extent to which the electromyographic (EMG) activity generated by the activation of single motor units is conducted from one neuromuscular compartment of the cat lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscle into adjacent compartments. 2. Potentials produced by stimulation of forty-five single motor units were monitored from bipolar fine-wire EMG electrodes which had been implanted either into the centres of each of the four neuromuscular compartments of LG or into regions of the muscle known to lie on the border of contiguous compartments. 3. In all cases single unit potentials could be recorded from the electrodes in the centre of the compartments which clearly identified the compartment of residence of the muscle unit. Regardless of unit type, the amplitude of the potential recorded from electrodes in one compartment was always greater than that recorded from any other compartment. 4. Smaller potentials could be recorded from electrodes in the centre of compartments adjacent to the compartment of residence of the muscle unit. For those motor units where the amplitude of the EMG potentials recorded from the compartment of residence was large, the amplitude of such 'cross-talk' could be greater than the amplitude of potentials recorded from the compartment of residence of smaller motor units. 5. In the case of electrodes placed at compartment boundaries, no clear compartment selectivity of recording of motor unit potentials was evident. 6. These results indicate that great care must be taken in choosing sites of EMG electrode placement when performing kinesiological studies, especially when the amplitude of the EMG activity recorded is of consideration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R Gatti, M Corti, S Govetto, K Bonzani, and S Boccardi Electromyographic activity to keep a lower limb in a raised position in healthy subjects and subjects with multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2008; 14(5): 691 - 693. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Rudroff, D. Staudenmann, and R. M. Enoka Electromyographic measures of muscle activation and changes in muscle architecture of human elbow flexors during fatiguing contractions J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1720 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ono, Y. Ishiwata, N. Inaba, T. Kuroda, and Y. Nakamura Modulation of the Inspiratory-Related Activity of Hypoglossal Premotor Neurons During Ingestion and Rejection in the Decerebrate Cat J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 48 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Sinderby, S. Friberg, N. Comtois, and A. Grassino Chest wall muscle cross talk in canine costal diaphragm electromyogram J Appl Physiol, November 1, 1996; 81(5): 2312 - 2327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]