J Physiol Society Meetings
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 441 pp 57-72
Copyright © 1991 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ugawa, Y
Right arrow Articles by Marsden, C D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ugawa, Y
Right arrow Articles by Marsden, C D

Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man.

Y Ugawa, B L Day, J C Rothwell, P D Thompson, P A Merton and C D Marsden

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, London.

1. We have stimulated over the cerebellum of intact human subjects by applying single electrical stimuli through electrodes placed on the back of the head, approximately at the level of the inion. The intensity of stimulation used was below that required to produce direct EMG responses in pre-activated muscles of the hand. 2. In ten subjects the effect of the stimulus over the cerebellum was to reduce the size of the EMG response in first dorsal interosseous muscle evoked by a magnetic stimulus to the cerebral cortex. In all subjects the onset of the period of suppression occurred when the test magnetic cortical shock followed the conditioning cerebellar shock by 5 ms. The duration of the suppression lasted from 3 to 7 ms. 3. The amount of suppression was related to the intensity of stimulation over the cerebellum. At 15% below the threshold for direct motor activation there was no effect; increasing suppression was evident at 10, 5 and 0% below motor threshold. 4. With a conditioning-test interval of 5-6 ms the suppression was the same whether the target muscle was relaxed or active. With longer conditioning-test intervals (12 and 15 ms) the amount of suppression was greater in active than relaxed muscles. 5. The short-latency suppression was greatest when the stimulating anode was ipsilateral to the target muscle and contralateral to the stimulated sensorimotor cortex. The later period of suppression was insensitive to the polarity of stimulation. When the stimulating electrodes were moved 2 cm caudally or cranially the short latency suppression disappeared whereas the longer latency suppression was still observed with the electrodes in the lower position. 6. Different results were obtained when the test EMG response was produced by an electrical (rather than magnetic) stimulus over the sensorimotor cortex. The short latency effect was no longer visible whereas the longer latency effect was the same as when testing with a magnetic cortical stimulus. 7. We suggest that a single electrical stimulus across the base of the skull (particularly with the anode over one cerebellar hemisphere) produces a short latency (5-6 ms) disfacilitation of the contralateral motor cortex through activation of cerebellar structures. A later (12 and 15 ms), less specific suppression which is present when testing in active muscles is thought to be mediated by a different mechanism and probably produces its effect at the level of the spinal cord.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Reis, O. B. Swayne, Y. Vandermeeren, M. Camus, M. A. Dimyan, M. Harris-Love, M. A. Perez, P. Ragert, J. C. Rothwell, and L. G. Cohen
Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 325 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Shibuya and Y. Ohki
Cutaneous Inputs Can Activate the Ipsilateral Primary Motor Cortex During Bimanual Sensory-Driven Movements in Humans
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3200 - 3209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Z. J. Daskalakis, G. O. Paradiso, B. K. Christensen, P. B. Fitzgerald, C. Gunraj, and R. Chen
Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans
J. Physiol., June 1, 2004; 557(2): 689 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. L. Taylor and S. C. Gandevia
Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2004; 96(4): 1496 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. A. Pastor, J. Artieda, J. Arbizu, J. M. Marti-Climent, I. Penuelas, and J. C. Masdeu
Activation of Human Cerebral and Cerebellar Cortex by Auditory Stimulation at 40 Hz
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2002; 22(23): 10501 - 10506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Restuccia, M. Valeriani, C. Barba, D. Le Pera, M. Capecci, V. Filippini, and M. Molinari
Functional changes of the primary somatosensory cortex in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions
Brain, April 1, 2001; 124(4): 757 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. A. J. Tijssen, M. Thom, D. W. Ellison, P. Wilkins, D. Barnes, P. D. Thompson, and P. Brown
Cortical myoclonus and cerebellar pathology
Neurology, March 28, 2000; 54(6): 1350 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 The Physiological Society.