J Physiol Society Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 442 pp 477-487
Copyright © 1991 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearon, M C
Right arrow Articles by Killian, K J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kearon, M C
Right arrow Articles by Killian, K J

Breathing during prolonged exercise in humans.

M C Kearon, E Summers, N L Jones, E J Campbell and K J Killian

Ambrose Cardiorespiratory Unit, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

1. Six normal subjects cycled to endurance or for 60 min at four work rates (WR 1-4): mean of 34% working capacity (93 watts for 60 min); 43% (120 watts for 56 min); 63% (177 watts for 37 min); and 84% (233 watts for 12 min), to determine how breathing pattern and dyspnoea change during prolonged activity. Four to six minutes were allowed to establish steady state and subsequent changes were considered to be endurance related. 2. Dyspnoea (Borg scale, 0-10) increased with the duration of activity at all work rates. 3. Ventilation (VE) did not change at WR1; increased from 44 to 47 l min-1 at WR2; from 60 to 88 l min-1 at WR3; and from 111 to 132 l min-1 at WR4. Dyspnoea was significantly and independently related to ventilation and duration of activity: dyspnoea = 0.004 VE1.36 time 0.25 (r = 0.81; partial F 202 and 26 respectively). 4. Inspiratory resistance did not increase at any work rate. Dynamic elastance remained constant during WR1, WR2 and WR3 but increased from 7.4 to 9.1 cmH2O l-1 during WR4. 5. Peak inspiratory pressure did not increase, and the increase in VE was accomplished by an increased breathing frequency without change in duty cycle. 6. Duration of activity is an important contributor to dyspnoea independent of changes in respiratory muscle contractile activity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. L. Jones and K. J. Killian
Exercise Limitation in Health and Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., August 31, 2000; 343(9): 632 - 641.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S G M Cloosterman, I D Hofland, C P van Schayck, and H T. M Folgering
Exertional dyspnoea in patients with airway obstruction, with and without CO2 retention
Thorax, September 1, 1998; 53(9): 768 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. Kayser, P. Sliwinski, S. Yan, M. Tobiasz, and P. T. Macklem
Respiratory effort sensation during exercise with induced expiratory-flow limitation in healthy humans
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 1997; 83(3): 936 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 The Physiological Society.