HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Deckert, A Articles by Stieve, H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Deckert, A Articles by Stieve, H

Institut für Biologie II, RWTH Aachen, FRG.

1. Light-induced currents were measured in Limulus ventral nerve photoreceptors using a two-electrode voltage clamp. Three kinetically distinct components in the light-induced current could be distinguished by varying the light adaptation state of the photoreceptor and the intensity of the stimulus light. 2. The components could be partly separated by choosing appropriate stimulus intensities and dark adaptation time. Thus the properties of the components could be separately studied. The first component is the first to recover after a light adaptation, appears temporally first in the light-induced response, has the lowest activation threshold and is the smallest. The second component needs a longer time to recover after an adapting illumination and its kinetics differ from that of the other components. Applying a bright stimulus to a dark-adapted cell a third component can be observed late in the response. 3. The time to peak of the first and the third components depended on the stimulus intensity, but not on the dark adaptation time. The time to peak of the second component became shorter the longer the dark adaptation time. For a constant adaptation state the time to the maximum of component 2 was independent, but those of components 1 and 3 were dependent on the membrane voltage. 4. To exclude the possibility of the contribution of voltage-gated currents, light-activated currents were measured at clamp potentials more negative than -50 mV after adding 4-aminopyridine into the bath solution or injecting tetraethyl-ammonium chloride into the cell. The properties of the three components remained unchanged under these conditions. 5. The I-V curve of the first component was flat at negative membrane potentials and had a strong outward rectification at positive membrane potentials. The I-V curve of component 3 showed a negative resistance at potentials more negative than about -30 mV. In contrast, the I-V curve for the second component was always nearly linear. 6. No membrane potential was found where the light-induced current was zero. Instead, current traces close to the reversal potential showed a complex waveform indicating different reversal potentials for the three components. 7. The results indicate that the current components are caused by three different populations of light-sensitive channels. The different activations, deactivations and recovery kinetics of the components suggest that the three types of channels are activated by distinct intracellular transmitters.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Gotow and T. Nishi Light-dependent K+ Channels in the Mollusc Onchidium Simple Photoreceptors Are Opened by cGMP J. Gen. Physiol., September 30, 2002; 120(4): 581 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. d. P. Gomez and E. Nasi Membrane Current Induced by Protein Kinase C Activators in Rhabdomeric Photoreceptors: Implications for Visual Excitation J. Neurosci., July 15, 1998; 18(14): 5253 - 5263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Ukhanov and R. Payne Rapid Coupling of Calcium Release to Depolarization in Limulus polyphemus Ventral Photoreceptors as Revealed by Microphotolysis and Confocal Microscopy J. Neurosci., March 1, 1997; 17(5): 1701 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]