J Physiol Wellcome Trust-funded researchers
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Physiol Vol 457 pp 503-513
Copyright © 1992 by The Physiological Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J L
Right arrow Articles by McCloskey, D I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J L
Right arrow Articles by McCloskey, D I

Detection of slow movements imposed at the elbow during active flexion in man.

J L Taylor and D I McCloskey

Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney, Australia.

1. Subjects' ability to detect movements imposed at the elbow during active flexion was measured. Movements of three different angular velocities (0.04, 0.4 and 4.4 deg/s) were applied to the arm while subjects maintained one of two force levels of active flexion. The threshold magnitudes for detection of the direction of imposed movement were found. 2. All thresholds were very small. At the lowest velocity of movement the average threshold was 0.13 deg and no subject had a threshold of greater than 0.3 deg. This contrasts with thresholds of over 2 deg measured in a previous study when the muscles about the joint were relaxed. Thresholds decreased further with increasing velocity of movement. 3. No difference was found between the two levels of contraction of the elbow flexors. However, extension (stretch of the contracting muscle) and flexion thresholds were calculated separately, and smaller extensions than flexions could be detected. 4. These findings indicate that conscious detection of imposed movements is greatly enhanced during active muscle contraction. Movements which cause unloading of the contracting agonist, as well as movements which result in stretch, are more easily detected than when the muscle is contracting. The discussion focuses on possible mechanisms for this enhancement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. Z. Z. Chew, S. C. Gandevia, and R. C. Fitzpatrick
Postural control at the human wrist
J. Physiol., March 1, 2008; 586(5): 1265 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Sturnieks, J. R. Wright, and R. C. Fitzpatrick
Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints
J. Physiol., December 15, 2007; 585(3): 833 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Maschke, C. M. Gomez, P. J. Tuite, and J. Konczak
Dysfunction of the basal ganglia, but not the cerebellum, impairs kinaesthesia
Brain, October 1, 2003; 126(10): 2312 - 2322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 The Physiological Society.